Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ??
place downtown so that the river runs through and make it resemble chicago's river. 3 10.34%
Move downtown all the way to the Harbor. 4 13.79%
Cluster all downtowns together 8 27.59%
Let it stay as is. 14 48.28%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012, 01:09 PM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,115,507 times
Reputation: 5667

Advertisements

??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2012, 09:14 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 5,452,476 times
Reputation: 3872
Downtown is where it is because, believe it or not, it's at the mouth of the L.A. River. It's just not a typical river, but seasonal. Anyone thinking it's not really a river hasn't lived here long enough to recall all the drownings (including a kid I knew in junior high) that happen when it floods. The reason it was paved is because the basin fills with braided streams that would make it impossible during the rainy season. And we still have flooding problems.

That's the particular geology here we have to understand first. Now the typical response is: Why build a city here then? Well, Chicago was built on a swamp and requires massive engineering to keep it from sinking. 'Tis what 'tis.

Downtowns become downtowns because they're attractive locations for business and civic life. In that sense, there's already a downtown by the ocean, Santa Monica. DTLA is attracting more business and if the money's there it'll attract more. No divine fiat necessary.

Would downtown "look better" by the sea? Maybe. I like the mountain backdrop, though. I say leave things as is and let DT evolve as it will. (Uh-oh, I hear a God versus evolution bit coming...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 10:23 AM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,115,507 times
Reputation: 5667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunjee View Post
Downtown is where it is because, believe it or not, it's at the mouth of the L.A. River. It's just not a typical river, but seasonal. Anyone thinking it's not really a river hasn't lived here long enough to recall all the drownings (including a kid I knew in junior high) that happen when it floods. The reason it was paved is because the basin fills with braided streams that would make it impossible during the rainy season. And we still have flooding problems.

That's the particular geology here we have to understand first. Now the typical response is: Why build a city here then? Well, Chicago was built on a swamp and requires massive engineering to keep it from sinking. 'Tis what 'tis.

Downtowns become downtowns because they're attractive locations for business and civic life. In that sense, there's already a downtown by the ocean, Santa Monica. DTLA is attracting more business and if the money's there it'll attract more. No divine fiat necessary.

Would downtown "look better" by the sea? Maybe. I like the mountain backdrop, though. I say leave things as is and let DT evolve as it will. (Uh-oh, I hear a God versus evolution bit coming...)
Thanks for the explanation.

I think the L.A. river would look amazing with high rises on either side and walkways in between. Just like the Chicago river. Of all the years I wonder why the city never decided to make something architecturally impressive with the river.

Is it me or has L.A. always been a city that never cared how it looks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 10:49 AM
 
Location: SoCal
19 posts, read 36,605 times
Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
Thanks for the explanation.

I think the L.A. river would look amazing with high rises on either side and walkways in between. Just like the Chicago river. Of all the years I wonder why the city never decided to make something architecturally impressive with the river.

Is it me or has L.A. always been a city that never cared how it looks?
Absolutely not. We've torn down many of our most beautiful buildings among other things that helped keep the city from looking as dull as it does now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 10:53 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
13,520 posts, read 22,131,339 times
Reputation: 20235
I'd move downtown closer to the beach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,858,119 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterK View Post
Absolutely not. We've torn down many of our most beautiful buildings among other things that helped keep the city from looking as dull as it does now.
You can call it ugly but there is nothing dull about the way Los Angeles looks - except for maybe the skyline but who cares about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
1,045 posts, read 1,978,417 times
Reputation: 690
Downtown LA is where it is because of something called the "Law of the Indies" which was the body of laws the Spanish crown used to settle its colonies in the New World.

Town settlement required location near a river/water source (LA river) and had to be within a days walking distance of a mission (San Gabriel Mission).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 12:43 PM
 
430 posts, read 1,650,950 times
Reputation: 332
Why we always gotta over complicate things? Just keep it as it is. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,858,119 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalParadise View Post
Downtown LA is where it is because of something called the "Law of the Indies" which was the body of laws the Spanish crown used to settle its colonies in the New World.

Town settlement required location near a river/water source (LA river) and had to be within a days walking distance of a mission (San Gabriel Mission).
Which also explains the unique alignment of downtown and its immediate surrounds.

I have also read that it had to be placed a certain distance from the shore to avoid being pillaged by pirates (not sure if that was really relevant at the time LA was founded).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 01:55 PM
 
2,131 posts, read 4,914,955 times
Reputation: 1002
If I had god like powers, I'd float Downtown about a mile up like the hallelujah mountains in the movie "Avatar".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top