Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2023, 09:11 PM
 
19 posts, read 23,377 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

I am in the process of relocating to the LA area from the East Coast for a job in Pasadena. Trying to "cast a net" for house hunting and figuring out which is the better direction to go. Pasadena itself is an excellent area along with some of the really close towns like San Marino & La Canada, but money goes further the further out you go it seems and it is a hybrid role so not an everyday commute. I am fine with up to 1hr each way.

Which way would be more advantageous to commute? I've heard a section of the 210 goes 5 to 4 to 5 lanes east of Pasadena (Irwindale?), but not 100% sure.

Eastbound commute, I'd be looking at: Glendale, Burbank, North Hollywood, Sherman Oaks, Encino, Tarzana, Woodland Hills, Porter Ranch, Granada Hills, Chatsworth, and Santa Clarita. Inventory in some of them is pretty limited and I don't have infinite money.

Westbound commute, I'd be looking at: Temple City, Glendora, West Covina, San Dimas, La Verne, Claremont, Diamond Bar, Walnut, Chino Hills, and Upland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2023, 11:54 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 10,628,669 times
Reputation: 4073
Do you need public schools?

If so, then Temple City, Glendora, San Dimas, La Verne, etc are no brainers.

If you can’t afford San Marino, La Canada, etc, that part of SGV with San Dimas, Glendora, etc is quite nice. Mostly older housing stock, but middle and upper middle class neighborhoods that don’t exist closer to LA.

I don’t see La Crescenta listed but it’s another place worth considering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2023, 05:50 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,727 posts, read 26,806,307 times
Reputation: 24790
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolcott123 View Post
Which way would be more advantageous to commute?

Eastbound commute, I'd be looking at: Glendale, Burbank, North Hollywood, Sherman Oaks, Encino, Tarzana, Woodland Hills, Porter Ranch, Granada Hills, Chatsworth, and Santa Clarita. Inventory in some of them is pretty limited and I don't have infinite money.
This is probably the better commute. Unless you're carpooling, the 210 going west is bumper to bumper from about 5:30 a.m. until 9 a.m., and again from around 2:30 pm until 7 pm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2023, 09:40 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,532 posts, read 24,022,219 times
Reputation: 23956
The westbound commute on I-210 during the morning rush hour will be heavier than the eastbound commute into Pasadena. The reverse will be true in the afternoon rush hours.

Some other areas to consider, which are close to Pasadena and are safe, livable neighborhoods: South Pasadena (separate city from Pasadena), Sierra Madre or Arcadia.
All three offer a relatively “manageable” commute to Pasadena. In Southern California, the best commute is a short one. Traffic can be a nightmare at times.

Last edited by ccm123; 02-19-2023 at 11:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2023, 05:43 PM
 
19 posts, read 23,377 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
This is probably the better commute. Unless you're carpooling, the 210 going west is bumper to bumper from about 5:30 a.m. until 9 a.m., and again from around 2:30 pm until 7 pm.

Good to know thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2023, 07:22 PM
 
Location: moved
13,652 posts, read 9,711,429 times
Reputation: 23480
An alternative, depending of course on school-needs, is to eschew either the SGV or SFV, and instead to look for a place along the 110-corridor. This includes Eagle Rock, western edge of Pasadena, Hyland Park, Mt. Washington, Montecito Heights, Elysian Hills and Silverlake. The appeal is topographic variety (mountains), views, the privacy possible when houses aren't on flat gridiron streets, and occasionally some deals with older housing-stock that could use a light renovation. Also, the climate is milder. Both Valleys get scalding hot in the summer. Downtown LA is noticeably cooler than Pasadena... the thermal gradient is as much as 1 degree per highway mile, heading south along the 110.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 11:43 PM
 
88 posts, read 89,684 times
Reputation: 183
Westbound commute because houses are cheaper there.

Monrovia and El Monte are pretty cheap and good commute to Pasadena.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:50 PM
 
567 posts, read 431,336 times
Reputation: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolcott123 View Post
I am in the process of relocating to the LA area from the East Coast for a job in Pasadena. Trying to "cast a net" for house hunting and figuring out which is the better direction to go. Pasadena itself is an excellent area along with some of the really close towns like San Marino & La Canada, but money goes further the further out you go it seems and it is a hybrid role so not an everyday commute. I am fine with up to 1hr each way.

Which way would be more advantageous to commute? I've heard a section of the 210 goes 5 to 4 to 5 lanes east of Pasadena (Irwindale?), but not 100% sure.

Eastbound commute, I'd be looking at: Glendale, Burbank, North Hollywood, Sherman Oaks, Encino, Tarzana, Woodland Hills, Porter Ranch, Granada Hills, Chatsworth, and Santa Clarita. Inventory in some of them is pretty limited and I don't have infinite money.

Westbound commute, I'd be looking at: Temple City, Glendora, West Covina, San Dimas, La Verne, Claremont, Diamond Bar, Walnut, Chino Hills, and Upland.
I think your best bet is looking for housing anywhere in the San Gabriel Valley. And you'll have more commute options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2023, 05:25 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,727 posts, read 26,806,307 times
Reputation: 24790
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccm123 View Post
Some other areas to consider, which are close to Pasadena and are safe, livable neighborhoods: South Pasadena (separate city from Pasadena), Sierra Madre or Arcadia.
All three offer a relatively “manageable” commute to Pasadena.
Remember that there's a world of difference in the price of a median home in South Pas ($1.8 million), Sierra Madre ($1.6) and Arcadia ($1.15), and areas further east such as Covina ($720k).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2023, 04:21 PM
 
Location: moved
13,652 posts, read 9,711,429 times
Reputation: 23480
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
Remember that there's a world of difference in the price of a median home in South Pas ($1.8 million), Sierra Madre ($1.6) and Arcadia ($1.15), and areas further east such as Covina ($720k).
South Pasadena is expensive because it's an island of excellent schools, surrounded by places with crummy schools - including "regular" Pasadena, where the pastime for more affluent people is to eschew public school entirely, sending their kids to private school. The other such local enclave is the curiously named "La Canada-Flintridge", whose schools are top-notch... but east of it (Altadena) and west it (Tujunga) things are much less favorable.

San Marino is its own animal... an old-money enclave, from back when LA was mostly rural. Some of those houses rival in grandeur and price, those of Brentwood or Bel Air.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top