Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2023, 08:47 AM
 
1,541 posts, read 1,129,329 times
Reputation: 740

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
Cities are meant to have more socioeconomic diversity. Boston has very little if any these days. That is a problem.

There have always been well known suburbs of Boston that are known for being wealthy havens to flock to. Why do you think affordable housing belongs in those towns?
You don't think Boston has socioeconomic diversity? What is that based on?

Why do you think lack of socioeconomic diversity in one place is a problem but not in another place? In the examples given above, we're not talking about poor drug addicts and alcoholics, but people in regular jobs that happen to make less money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2023, 08:52 AM
 
16,445 posts, read 8,242,983 times
Reputation: 11440
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplexsimon View Post
You don't think Boston has socioeconomic diversity? What is that based on?

Why do you think lack of socioeconomic diversity in one place is a problem but not in another place? In the examples given above, we're not talking about poor drug addicts and alcoholics, but people in regular jobs that happen to make less money.
People who make less money should live in a place they can afford then. It's a trickle down effect from Boston I'd say.

What issue is affordable housing really solving? It is creating other issues if anything - overpopulation, more traffic, crowding, ruining nature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:17 AM
 
5,118 posts, read 2,680,626 times
Reputation: 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplexsimon View Post
You don't think Boston has socioeconomic diversity? What is that based on?

Why do you think lack of socioeconomic diversity in one place is a problem but not in another place? In the examples given above, we're not talking about poor drug addicts and alcoholics, but people in regular jobs that happen to make less money.
How many people making 60-80K per year do you expect to afford to live relatively independently in Boston? That's a relatively good salary and yet it would be very difficult to swing. Not interested in hearing about how they should shack up with a dozen other people. That's for kids (or adults with the mentality of kids), not adults wanting to live independently. Boston is home to those earning at least close to six figures, those shacking up with multiple others, and those on public benefits. Middle class adults need not apply. That's not socioeconomic diversity in my book.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:18 AM
 
16,445 posts, read 8,242,983 times
Reputation: 11440
This looks like a great affordable house for someone:

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3...58521320_zpid/

In a suburb.

The problem has become people want fancy affordable homes in the nicer suburbs. It's funny how entitled people have become.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:37 AM
 
1,541 posts, read 1,129,329 times
Reputation: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostongymjunkie View Post
How many people making 60-80K per year do you expect to afford to live relatively independently in Boston? That's a relatively good salary and yet it would be very difficult to swing. Not interested in hearing about how they should shack up with a dozen other people. That's for kids (or adults with the mentality of kids), not adults wanting to live independently. Boston is home to those earning at least close to six figures, those shacking up with multiple others, and those on public benefits. Middle class adults need not apply. That's not socioeconomic diversity in my book.
I agree that the cost of living is a problem but disagree its not diverse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:42 AM
 
23,625 posts, read 18,749,452 times
Reputation: 10834
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
People who make less money should live in a place they can afford then. It's a trickle down effect from Boston I'd say.

What issue is affordable housing really solving? It is creating other issues if anything - overpopulation, more traffic, crowding, ruining nature.

It seems like you want things both ways. You complain about how much housing costs, yet you are opposed to ANY new construction whatsoever. We ended up in this situation we are in, due to attitudes like yours.



And please don't say "oh well Boston can build more", because they have. That city is only a small sliver of the areas land mass, and can't continue to solve this mess all on its own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,661 posts, read 12,808,075 times
Reputation: 11233
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostongymjunkie View Post
How many people making 60-80K per year do you expect to afford to live relatively independently in Boston? That's a relatively good salary and yet it would be very difficult to swing. Not interested in hearing about how they should shack up with a dozen other people. That's for kids (or adults with the mentality of kids), not adults wanting to live independently. Boston is home to those earning at least close to six figures, those shacking up with multiple others, and those on public benefits. Middle class adults need not apply. That's not socioeconomic diversity in my book.

Many people in Boston live in alone owned by their families over generations, or live independently in the 20% of housing that is income-restricted but not public housing or section 8. Then you have many Bostonians living at market rate. as couples. Two 60k incomes is 120k and enough to live in Boston in a market rate 1 or 2 bedroom.

Many folks bought condos for 200-350k from 2010-2016 too.

Socioeconomic diveristy but you’re not focusing on the socio. Which includes racial, linguistic, religious, and ethnic diversity- which Boston is chock full of. As well as occupational diversity given how diverse the economy is in Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,661 posts, read 12,808,075 times
Reputation: 11233
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
This looks like a great affordable house for someone:

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3...58521320_zpid/

In a suburb.

The problem has become people want fancy affordable homes in the nicer suburbs. It's funny how entitled people have become.
Kingston is extremely far from Boston but the irony here is someone will buy and live in that home. Just because it’s for sale doesn’t mean no one wants it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:54 AM
 
23,625 posts, read 18,749,452 times
Reputation: 10834
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesmaybe View Post
The problem is that the people who might consider buying a 700k condo don't want to live in Bridgewater. They want to live in Boston. The people who might want to live there and can afford 700k want an SFH.

But a $400K condo in Bridgewater will sell overnight. Build enough of them, eventually they will come down in price (especially if "nobody wants them at $700K").
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2023, 09:57 AM
 
5,118 posts, read 2,680,626 times
Reputation: 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
Many people in Boston live in alone owned by their families over generations, or live independently in the 20% of housing that is income-restricted but not public housing or section 8. Then you have many Bostonians living at market rate. as couples. Two 60k incomes is 120k and enough to live in Boston in a market rate 1 or 2 bedroom.

Many folks bought condos for 200-350k from 2010-2016 too.

Socioeconomic diveristy but you’re not focusing on the socio. Which includes racial, linguistic, religious, and ethnic diversity- which Boston is chock full of. As well as occupational diversity given how diverse the economy is in Boston.
Income-restricted = public benefit. I was referring to single households, hence "living independently." Living with someone else is not living independently. Obviously there are some, such as those you refer to who bought condos, but not enough to establish socioeconomic diversity in my view. Boston may display certain socio diversity but whether it coincides with economic diversity is another question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top