Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:22 PM
 
1,489 posts, read 3,602,568 times
Reputation: 711

Advertisements

I think Toronto and Detroit comparisons are apples and oranges.

Remember, this was Seattle/Detroit 40 years ago. A fair number of educated people have been leaving MI for thirty years to seek better opportunities and WA has, in turn, been attracting them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
382 posts, read 1,054,508 times
Reputation: 148
yea, I simply like the geography, size, density, climate comparison. demographics is very uncomprable
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 03:43 PM
 
1,489 posts, read 3,602,568 times
Reputation: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann_Arbor View Post
yea, I simply like the geography, size, density, climate comparison. demographics is very uncomprable
What does make them comparable is the fact that in 1970, Boeing was the giant major employer of the region, as was the auto industry for Detroit.

One city diversified, one has not. Forty years later, the results speak for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 04:23 PM
 
199 posts, read 543,245 times
Reputation: 79
I don't think Seattle had to "Diversify" to attract anyone. It all happened naturally because it's a desirable place to live. The city has the ocean and mountain views. It's probably the nicest city I've been to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,860,382 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlohaHuey View Post
What does make them comparable is the fact that in 1970, Boeing was the giant major employer of the region, as was the auto industry for Detroit.

One city diversified, one has not. Forty years later, the results speak for themselves.
Again Aloha, it's apples to oranges. Boeing in 1970 was 40,000 people or so. The automotive industry in Michigan was 400,000. There is.no.comparison.

Try comparing Toronto of 1970 and Detroit of 1970.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:39 AM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,132,098 times
Reputation: 4931
I think it is probably much better to compare Chicago and Detroit in 1970. For most of the 20th century they had similar prosperity, rates of growth, population density, immigration, architecture.

After 1970, the two cities went in different directions. Although Chicago declined and started to revitalize in the late 80s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:40 AM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,132,098 times
Reputation: 4931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Specialbuddy View Post
I don't think Seattle had to "Diversify" to attract anyone. It all happened naturally because it's a desirable place to live. The city has the ocean and mountain views. It's probably the nicest city I've been to.
Exactly. The midwest always has to try harder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2011, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Midwest
1,004 posts, read 2,773,093 times
Reputation: 253
I've always thought Detriot and Minneapolis to be very similar cities.
Yeah Seattle has the upper hand over Detriot any day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:18 AM
 
1,489 posts, read 3,602,568 times
Reputation: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
Again Aloha, it's apples to oranges. Boeing in 1970 was 40,000 people or so. The automotive industry in Michigan was 400,000. There is.no.comparison.

Try comparing Toronto of 1970 and Detroit of 1970.
Comparing a Canadian city to an American city is Apples/Oranges to me. For a variety of reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2011, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,860,382 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlohaHuey View Post
Comparing a Canadian city to an American city is Apples/Oranges to me. For a variety of reasons.
Such as....

The differences between Detroit and Toronto are probably no greater than the differences between Detroit and Seattle, IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top