Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2010, 10:08 PM
 
7 posts, read 17,887 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

There are moments throughout time where evolution pushes forward and different species are capable of evolving at a faster rate than usual. However, this accelerated rate of change takes anywhere from 10,000 years to a million years to occur. With the acceleration of technology in the past 50 years it may become impossible for human evolution to keep up with the pace of technology. What do we do when evolution can't keep up with the rate of change in technology that humans are now forced to confront?

Rebecca Costa | Facebook (http://www.lisp4.facebook.com/rebeccadcosta - broken link)

Rebecca D. Costa: The Watchman
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2010, 10:09 PM
 
7 posts, read 17,887 times
Reputation: 10
Default Social Problems on a Global scale - Complexity

Despite having access to the technology to help alleviate global problems like starvation and famine, world governments haven’t found a cost efficient way to work together to solve them. Although wealthier nations do send aid throughout the world it’s still difficult to ensure that the people who are suffering actually receive the help they need. Corruption is prevalent throughout the world and to some degree even in developed western nations. As the world continues to become more complex, Rebecca Costa discusses the reasons her book "The Watchman's Rattle", is meant to resolve these problems.


BP Oil crisis - Complexity

Why does something as simple as an oil leak turn into a full blown out crisis? Part of the reason is that British Petroleum (BP) denied world wide help until BP realized that the oil leak was much greater than they had anticipated. Rebecca Costa discusses in her book “The Watchman’s Rattle”, how difficult it is to get people, businesses and governments to work together to solve problems. Even though we have access to the technology to prevent global epidemics like famine and starvation, they still occur despite our best efforts. What might start off as a simple problem can quickly escalate into a natural disaster if the appropriate response doesn’t happen immediately.

Rebecca Costa | Facebook (http://www.lisp4.facebook.com/rebeccadcosta - broken link)

Rebecca D. Costa: The Watchman
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 11:17 PM
 
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
5,002 posts, read 12,354,936 times
Reputation: 4125
I agree with Ray Kurzweil, who predicts that humans will transcend their biological entities and merge with computers and become cyborgs or outright androids.

However, unlike Kurzweil, I disagree that it will be for humanitarian or noble ideals that we transcend - I think it will be the opposite reason; survival. We humans will be unable to survive on our home planet at the rate of natural resource depletion and pollution of the biosphere. Therefore, we will be forced to transcend. This will open up the possibility of us exploring and colonizing other worlds since by becoming androids, we will have essentially become immortal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 06:29 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 3,500,566 times
Reputation: 1315
Since humans are responsible for technological advances, it is impossible for technology to evolve faster than the species that controls it. Logic fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Virginia
33 posts, read 66,571 times
Reputation: 45
[quote=anewhope;15503968]What do we do when evolution can't keep up with the rate of change in technology that humans are now forced to confront?

Interesting question. I can think of two technologies that could, or have, outstripped the evolution of human wisdom (if such a thing even evolves): nuclear energy and recombinant DNA. Either of those technologies provide the means for the betterment or the downfall of humanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 12:06 AM
 
7 posts, read 17,887 times
Reputation: 10
This is probably a horrible example, but it's what comes to mind and hopefully it'll be funny.

In the movie Jurassic Park, the scientist's took knowledge they used for granted, and spliced dinosaur DNA. Those scientist's didn't earn the knowledge of bioengineering of genetic scientists before hand, they took something and didn't even realize what they had before they used it. And then everyone was eaten by dinosaurs.

And I suppose that's the glory of science, to take all the research and confirmation learned by other scientists, to use that knowledge and conduct research that pushes science to the edge.

I'm saying that when scientist's try to make breakthrough's in research(fringe Science), that's when our evolution won't be able to keep up with technology. Which will lead to self destruction.


One mistake and ....... suddenly we got a problem that we don't know how to fix, like say Global Warming. All we can do is try to not make it worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 07:24 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 3,500,566 times
Reputation: 1315
[quote=anewhope;15519477]This is probably a horrible example, but it's what comes to mind and hopefully it'll be funny.

In the movie Jurassic Park, the scientist's took knowledge they used for granted, and spliced dinosaur DNA. Those scientist's didn't earn the knowledge of bioengineering of genetic scientists before hand, they took something and didn't even realize what they had before they used it. And then everyone was eaten by dinosaurs.

First off, its a movie. They took "freedoms" with what science can/cannot actually do. If referencing a movie is the best example you can come up with, that should tell you right off the bat that your argument doesn't hold water. How about a real-world example perhaps? Yes, it was a horrible example.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anewhope View Post
And I suppose that's the glory of science, to take all the research and confirmation learned by other scientists, to use that knowledge and conduct research that pushes science to the edge.
What is your point here? Yes, that is the point of science, to push the envelope of knowledge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anewhope View Post
I'm saying that when scientist's try to make breakthrough's in research(fringe Science), that's when our evolution won't be able to keep up with technology. Which will lead to self destruction.
Again with the failed logic. That is the whole idea of science...to make breakthroughs. In what way has technology outpaced our ability to control it? Also failed logic: that technologic advancement automatically leads to self-destruction.


[quote=anewhope;15519477]One mistake and ....... suddenly we got a problem that we don't know how to fix, like say Global Warming. All we can do is try to not make it worse.[quote=anewhope;15519477][/font]

How is Global Warming an example of technology that spun out of control?????

Global Warming has a straight-forward cause: Too many many machines/factories producing too much carbon dioxide trapping heat in the earth atmosphere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2010, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Sitting on a bar stool. Guinness in hand.
4,428 posts, read 6,506,556 times
Reputation: 1721
Well......I thinking that humans (more daring humans) will use that technology to evolve themselves. Whether that going to be through the use of....for lack of a better word...Mechanical means, like adding computer chips in our brains or bodies.....perhap we'll evolve into something like Borg from star trek. Or perhaps we'll evolve ourselves further through the use of our advancing biological knowledge. I have no idea what that will do to us as a species. Or perhaps it will be a combination of the both.

I think the next 1000 years will be very interesting time for the human race as long as we don't destroy ourselves or end up in a another dark age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 06:02 AM
 
Location: NZ Wellington
2,782 posts, read 4,164,177 times
Reputation: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by anewhope View Post
There are moments throughout time where evolution pushes forward and different species are capable of evolving at a faster rate than usual. However, this accelerated rate of change takes anywhere from 10,000 years to a million years to occur. With the acceleration of technology in the past 50 years it may become impossible for human evolution to keep up with the pace of technology. What do we do when evolution can't keep up with the rate of change in technology that humans are now forced to confront?

Rebecca Costa | Facebook (http://www.lisp4.facebook.com/rebeccadcosta - broken link)

Rebecca D. Costa: The Watchman
We can use that technology to pick our own genes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2010, 07:33 PM
 
7 posts, read 17,887 times
Reputation: 10
"First off, its a movie. They took "freedoms" with what science can/cannot actually do. If referencing a movie is the best example you can come up with, that should tell you right off the bat that your argument doesn't hold water. How about a real-world example perhaps? Yes, it was a horrible example."

well. I wanted an example that everyone had seen and could relate too.

A more realistic example is Global Warming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top