Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2013, 07:37 AM
SFT SFT started this thread
 
79 posts, read 207,256 times
Reputation: 42

Advertisements

I've been intrigued by the idea of tiny homes as of late. After the rat race of going to school and getting into a bit of debt, it has made me more frugal than most. I see most people living day to day in quite a bit of debt. At most, the people I know might have a years worth of expenses in an emergency fund, but what about after that? Huge expenses and moderate investments which will be quickly depleted.

So, my idea is to basically work a normal job in the IT field. Do the rat race for 10-15 years, while living in a small home. I figure land in a moderately accessible place (~40-45 minutes from Boston) and a small home would probably cost me in the region of $40-100k. The land is definitely the highest cost. The low end would be a small lot (1/3 of an acre, less accessible). The higher end would probably be for 2-5+ acres.

My only concern is that my girlfriend of a few years will certainly not take well to this idea. She is not the type that needs a 3000+ sq. ft. home, but I can't see her living in a 300-400 sq. ft. home either. Personally, I don't care what anyone thinks because I know that I will be much better off than them in 20 years. That being said, I feel like many women are more sensitive to "keeping up" with their friends.

I figure that housing, and the maintenance of (including taxes), is by far the greatest expense that one will be burdened with throughout a lifetime. Ideally, I'd like to get to the point where I could take a year off of work if I wanted to and not have to worry about starving. I am not a lazy person by any means, but I don't think anyone should live paycheck to paycheck and I have been doing so since I graduated college.

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:30 AM
 
Location: New England
1,239 posts, read 2,007,799 times
Reputation: 931
What about meeting in the middle and doing an 800 sq ft one. Tumbleweed has some really cute floor plans...I know guys don't care about cute!

B-53 Plans

I have a friend who was looking at doing this, but then had 3 kids!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:42 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,766 posts, read 40,152,606 times
Reputation: 18084
There's nothing wrong with a small starter home. Go for the tiny house and upgrade if you need to. Any house you buy now is most likely not going to be your "forever home".

So are you thinking that you'll never want kids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:48 AM
 
223 posts, read 540,082 times
Reputation: 213
why get get adventurous at the same time? move onto a boat or RV for a few months/year.... It is less of an anchor than a house
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Lacey, WA
489 posts, read 963,552 times
Reputation: 585
If momma ain't happy, ain't no one happy. Just sayin'.

-Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:58 AM
 
3,034 posts, read 9,135,202 times
Reputation: 1741
Quote:
Originally Posted by pauloman View Post
why get get adventurous at the same time? move onto a boat or RV for a few months/year.... It is less of an anchor than a house

and probably has the square footage you're looking for

perhaps a mobile home would fit the bill

as for being better off than friends that purchased a normal home - only time will tell
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Kalamalka Lake, B.C.
3,563 posts, read 5,374,083 times
Reputation: 4975
If you look at the interior open plans of a lot of starter homes these days they're mimicking Vancouver condominiums.
The judicious use of small space only has one drawback. The new homes are so small that your main problem is finding someone that's not claustrophobic.

If you take a look at vancouver condos they make better use of as little as 380 sq. feet compared to 1,000 plus sq. ft. in an old design.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 04:12 PM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,979,534 times
Reputation: 8910
Shelter-Kit homes - a New Hampshire company - have been selling small home kits for decades.

LINK

Not sure if what you are seeking is going to cost effective.
Probably difficult to re-sell such a small home.
And if a well and septic are thrown in the cost is roughly the same for a small house as a large.

A better idea is to construct a larger home and just not finish it. Finish the part you will live in and block off the rest.

Land/lots - most rural towns require a minimum of one or two acres.

Once you crunch the numbers may not add up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 05:14 PM
 
Location: The New England part of Ohio
24,095 posts, read 32,437,200 times
Reputation: 68283
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ5150 View Post
If momma ain't happy, ain't no one happy. Just sayin'.

-Mike

I agree. It isn't only about "keeping up with our friends" we generally have more stuff - clothes especially and we like to decorate our abode. Three hundred square feet in tight, for two!

I've looked into it as a vacation home and I think it's an good idea. Also as a guest house.

You do need to consider your girlfriend's needs. though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2013, 11:38 AM
 
Location: WMHT
4,569 posts, read 5,666,362 times
Reputation: 6761
Designing around a small space makes sense for an apartment or condo in the middle of a city, but I don't understand the attraction of building a small freestanding home on a large lot. Are you really gaining anything other than a bit of initial savings on construction costs?

Quote:
A better idea is to construct a larger home and just not finish it. Finish the part you will live in and block off the rest.
Makes a lot of sense, particularly if you keep the unfinished portion as unconditioned space. Otherwise heating and cooling efficiency seems like it would be VERY poor in a 400 sq ft house, just from the square/cube law. In an apartment building you don't have this issue because the actual building envelope encompasses all your neighbors.

If you want to live in a small home for the next decade, buy a condo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top