Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-22-2018, 09:33 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,418,669 times
Reputation: 21252

Advertisements

Secaucus Junction seems to be a very important transit hub for Northern New Jersey and the Tri-State area since so many New Jersey Transit trains, Metro-North trains, and buses service the station.

I understand the Meadowlands should be preserved for various reasons including as a mitigation measure for flooding and I'm not advocating building over the parts currently existing. However, there seems to be a lot of parking lots and low-slung buildings within a half mile radius and it seems like these parts would make great sense in terms of doing much more high-density development both for residential and commercial usage. With that, a transportation hub like Secaucus Junction can then be leveraged as a much stronger commercial hub.

Is there a large host of strong technical reasons against this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2018, 12:32 PM
 
3,305 posts, read 3,868,278 times
Reputation: 2592
The ground is very mixed, but mostly the bedrock is harder to find for building foundations. Buildings are lower and spread the weight out horizontally to avoid literally sinking into the marshland.

Putting up a high rise and floating the foundation simply makes it too expensive for the most part, it's easier and less expensive to build such buildings not very far away. So it's less a host of reasons and just the main one: cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,312,201 times
Reputation: 6917
There was a proposal to build skyscrapers attached to the Secaucus Jct station when it first opened, but those plans were abandoned, probably due to the reasons jaymoney mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 02:44 PM
 
3,305 posts, read 3,868,278 times
Reputation: 2592
They could do it near Snake Hill, but that land's been turned into a park and the surrounded by condos, so I doubt they're going to find a similar chunk of rock large enough. The condos are also probably depressing the market right now as well, so it's hard to build luxury condos in those conditions.

This is an interesting study, from back i the 50's. But even then there are sections of the maps marked "Bedrock?" indicating that they don't even know how far down it goes. Most of the borings seem to indicate that it's gravel, clay, and sand for at least the first hundred feet or so, and then it's on to shale.
http://www.state.nj.us/dep/njgs/pric...port/gsr01.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top