Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2010, 07:49 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,626,203 times
Reputation: 5944

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by domino View Post
Most southerners will tell you that Texas is not southern . . . I guess no one really wants to claim them, or they don't fit neatly into any category.
Actually, while that statement has at least a respectable degree of validity, it is also extremely relative to exactly who the Southerner is, and where they in turn are located. And by what characteristics they define "the South."

I mean, my ancestral roots are deep in Mississippi and Alabama, and I have distant cousins and friends there who define the South as consisting only of those states plus Georgia (and possibily South Carolina). In other words, with all seriousness, I know some who even exclude Louisiana fer gosh sakes...to say nothing of Tennessee, North Carolina, etc. LOL

The only "perceptual South" survey I ever knew of done was at the UNC at Chapel Hill, by graduate students in the "Southern studies" program. The survey form listed all the American states and the simple question was: Is this state Southern, all in all"?

Over 75% said yes to: Louisiana, Mississppi, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. Over 50% affirmed: Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky and Virginia. The states of Oklahoma and West Virginia tallied up about a quarter to third of the votes. Missouri got a few. No other state got any.

It would be interesting to see the same done with regional studies students in the true Southwestern states of New Mexico and Arizona. I am betting those who would exclude Texas from their definition of the Southwest would be much higher than their counter parts in the southeast who would exclude Texas (or others).

Anyway, not trying to turn this New Mexico thread into a treatise on "Southern studies".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:17 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,626,203 times
Reputation: 5944
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
TexasReb - Well said.
Thanks CAVA (and to two other poster who repped me for this).

Something else that occured to me concerning the vast historical and cultural differences between Texas and the core interior SW states (i.e. New Mexico and Arizona) is -- as many have mentioned -- the long-established Native-American and Hispanic population which are the dominant influences on the history.

While Texas has a sizeable hispanic population, it is fairly recent phenomemon. As Raymond Gastil (who first coined the term "Western South" to label the vast majority of Texas and a goodly portion of Oklahoma) put it in his book "Cultural Regions of the United States":

Unlike the Interior Southwest, neither aboriginal Indian nor Spanish-American culture played a central role in the definition of the area. The people of Texas are mostly from the Lower, Upper, and Mountain South and these Southerners easily outnumbered the Spanish speaking and Indian people even before the state joined the Union. Therefore, when we refer to a large Spanish-speaking population in Texas, we are primarily speaking of a relatively recent immigrant population, quite different from the core areas of the Interior Southwest."

And from "The Southwest Defined" (edited by Joseph Carleton Wilder)

Current demographic statistics do not provoke any great revision in determining that area which we can call the "Hispanic Southwest." Place names in southern Texas and California suggest a rich and enduring Hispanic heritage in those two states. But following the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, hordes of white Americans rushed into these Hispanic areas of Texas, and, even though white Americans totally dominated these parts of Texas, they continued to use many existing Spanish place names. Most of California's Spanish place names were designated by Anglo real estate developers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in an attempt to capitalize commercially on the state's romance that visitors and newcomers to the region found so "quaint" and attractive. A meaningful cultural presence of Hispanic traditions cannot be derived merely from Spanish place names. And other qualifications- primarily physiographic, climatic, and prehistoric-preclude Texas and California from being placed within "the Southwest.

As to the Native American influence and presence, it is not even in the ballpark with the true SW. Myths of the television series "Walker, Texas Ranger" (with Chuck Norris) not withstanding, there are only three very small "Indian reservations" in Texas; none of them anything like what is usually visualized when the term is mentioned.

Yes, in the early settlement post-Civil War era, the Hollywood "cowboy and Indians" (and fights between Native Americans and settlers) aspect had a lot of basis in truth. BUT...most of the Plains tribes were pretty well removed from Texas early on, and Native-American culture had very little impact on the state's overall politics, archetecture, etc.

For sure, one is not going to find those towns and tourist areas where authentic Indian curios, wares, jewelry, souvenier items, etc., are a mainstay and source of income. Things which -- as others have said -- are very commonplace in, and associated with, the real Southwest.

*grinning a bit* I have seen some TV shows and movies which seem to suggest those bolo string-ties with turquoise slides are common-place among native Texans. I always had to laugh a bit at that as it is just not true (at least in my observation and experience).

Oh sure, I remember back in the 70's when they become popular as a stylish fad (I had one myself), but that was all it was. It had about the same relevance in terms of a deep-rooted connection with traditional SW attire as another the fad of of the same era -- the wearing of a St. Christopher medallion -- had with that most native anglo/black Texans were of the Catholic faith. Which was little to none.

If that makes sense. :confused

Ok...sorry to have rambled on!

Last edited by TexasReb; 01-29-2010 at 08:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
908 posts, read 2,855,507 times
Reputation: 731
No need to apologize. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Good stuff here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,238,341 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by trailtramp View Post
The part of the country most overrun by lawbreaking ILLEGAL ALIENS
Yeah? we need higher fences........
and, there's a hiring freeze for CBP agents....go figure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2010, 05:31 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,238,341 times
Reputation: 586
Desert sand colored buildings made of stucco with timbers protruding from them, and art work or murals of past civilizations painted over the desert sand color. Also, adobe type building and dwellings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top