Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
On the off chance that wasn't a sarcastic remark, no they're not.
The thread is labeled "candidates", not "GOP primary candidates", and the former is what I opined upon.
It was an honest question. I'm not on here to knock anyones views. You are correct about the title. In the body of the original post I did specify, but I guess I should have put it in the title.
Well, obviously he would fit in well with the government of New Mexico and the Federal government.
What makes Arnold-Jones a more qualified candidate, if you don't mind me asking?
I thought you didn't want this to turn into a political bashing thread?
At first blush, I find myself leaning toward Turner or Arnold-Jones. But I have yet to dig too deeply into their individual stances on various issues. At this point, they both seem to fit into the conservative/libertarian, pro-business, low-tax "ballpark". (Weh & Domenici strike me as more of the "same 'ol" Republican types that owe just a little too much to special interests.)
But I must say, a certain someone's endorsement of Arnold-Jones certainly doesn't help her cause.
At first blush, I find myself leaning toward Turner or Arnold-Jones. But I have yet to dig too deeply into their individual stances on various issues. At this point, they both seem to fit into the conservative/libertarian, pro-business, low-tax "ballpark". (Weh & Domenici strike me as more of the "same 'ol" Republican types that owe just a little too much to special interests.)
But I must say, a certain someone's endorsement of Arnold-Jones certainly doesn't help her cause.
Chap
Thanks Chap. I am leaning toward Turner as well. I need to do more research before I'm 100%, but so far I'm happy with what I've seen/heard.
I don't want someone from either end of the political spectrum - whatever happened to moderates who were willing to broker compromises? When you vote in the far left and far right, you get gridlock. Can anyone say "Congress"? We really don't need that on a state level.
I don't want someone from either end of the political spectrum - whatever happened to moderates who were willing to broker compromises? When you vote in the far left and far right, you get gridlock. Can anyone say "Congress"? We really don't need that on a state level.
Does that mean you wont be voting? Or is there a candidate you see that represents your views?
When you vote in the far left and far right, you get gridlock.
For many people, that's the idea.
For many, a government that does nothing does no wrong.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
