Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2013, 05:11 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Pelham Parkway,The Bronx
9,247 posts, read 24,075,713 times
Reputation: 7759

Advertisements

Wow,a little surprising that De Blasio's lead seems to be growing, despite the NY Times and The Post .It's up to 71% to 21% for Lhota. A couple of weeks ago it was 60 -30.Only 5% remain undecided and less than 1% of De Blasio supporters say they could possibly change their minds.Unless something big happens to change things this could be a huge blowout.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/ny...html?src=twrhp

It will be interesting to see if De Blasio can win by the highest margin ever.So far,only Ed Koch has been elected with over 70% of the vote.He got 78% in 1985.Seems a real stretch to get up that high but it could be possible.Only four other mayors have gone over the 60% line,Wagner with 68% in 1957 ,Hylan with 66% in 1925,Walker with 66% in 1925 and La Guardia with 60% in 1937.

Catsimitidis would have made a much better Republican candidate than Lhota.

Last edited by bluedog2; 10-03-2013 at 05:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2013, 05:35 AM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,972,470 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog2 View Post
Wow,a little surprising that De Blasio's lead seems to be growing, despite the NY Times and The Post .It's up to 71% to 21% for Lhota. A couple of weeks ago it was 60 -30.Only 5% remain undecided and less than 1% of De Blasio supporters say they could possibly change their minds.Unless something big happens to change things this could be a huge blowout.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/ny...html?src=twrhp

It will be interesting to see if De Blasio can win by the highest margin ever.So far,only Ed Koch has been elected with over 70% of the vote.He got 78% in 1985.Seems a real stretch to get up that high but it could be possible.Only four other mayors have gone over the 60% line,Wagner with 68% in 1957 ,Hylan with 66% in 1925,Walker with 66% in 1925 and La Guardia with 60% in 1937.

Catsimitidis would have made a much better Republican candidate than Lhota.
Another billionaire was not going to win after Bloomberg, period. Not even on the Republican ticket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,073,996 times
Reputation: 12769
People are just asking themselves "Do we want someone who managed the MTA to try to manage the City?"
The answer has to be apparent to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

Quote:

21% for Lhota
That's fairly close to the percentage of registered Republican voters who have only TWO motives: to keep the taxes low on the wealthy and to guarantee that corporations, primarily financial corporations, are not held to tighter regulations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 06:57 AM
 
5,000 posts, read 8,215,558 times
Reputation: 4574
Yeah man, he's like totally gonna stick to his rhetoric about being for the common guy. I'm so psyched...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
2,894 posts, read 5,906,363 times
Reputation: 2186
Why is the NYT so antagonistic to De Blasio? I get the Post being like that (being part of News corp.) but why is the times doing this? is it because they didn't get their way getting Bloomberg redux (Quinn)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,073,996 times
Reputation: 12769
Quote:
Why is the NYT so antagonistic to De Blasio?
The major media, ALL the major media including the NY Times, are huge corporate conglomerates whose main concern is the bottom line. Any REAL leftist populist is their foresworn enemy and they behave accordingly by going into attack-dog mode.
They can pay lip service occasional left of center positions as long as it is good for circulation, but if they think it will cost them a single penny of profits, their true capitalist colors soon emerge scathingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 08:05 AM
 
5,000 posts, read 8,215,558 times
Reputation: 4574
Yeah man, down with capitalism maaaaaaan...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Bronx
16,200 posts, read 23,043,499 times
Reputation: 8345
Quote:
Originally Posted by NyWriterdude View Post
Another billionaire was not going to win after Bloomberg, period. Not even on the Republican ticket.
I agree with this. NYC does not need another billionaire mayor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 11:23 AM
 
1,431 posts, read 2,618,316 times
Reputation: 1199
Quote:
Originally Posted by likeminas View Post
Why is the NYT so antagonistic to De Blasio? I get the Post being like that (being part of News corp.) but why is the times doing this? is it because they didn't get their way getting Bloomberg redux (Quinn)?
Why do you feel the Times is antagonistic to de Blasio? The Sandinista story? I didn't think that was necessarily antagonistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2013, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
1,871 posts, read 4,266,503 times
Reputation: 2937
Quote:
Originally Posted by BinxBolling View Post
Why do you feel the Times is antagonistic to de Blasio? The Sandinista story? I didn't think that was necessarily antagonistic.
I've been keeping up with the New York Times articles written about De Blasio and they don't seem antagonistic to me either. In fact, if anything they are mildly complimentary.

I agree that it was the Sandinista story that I think many people found offensive and I have no idea why. It was a factual part of his past and he is pretty open about it. He worked for a charity and sympathized with that side of the conflict. What's the big deal? He was a young idealistic college student--as if there has never been any of those before.

If Bill De Blasio were in his early twenties today, he'd be living in Williamsburg. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top