Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right, the details of that proposal is what I'd like to know. most of the sources I've found are murky.
Well, read the text of the relevant act that was introduced to the Congress in May. The act is referenced in the article for which you have a link in this thread. Nothing murky about it, on the contrary, it is very direct.
Should be a no brainer. The city is enabling their crimes as the persons in question are perps who’ve been arrested and would’ve been deported. We aren’t talking innocent “law abiding” illegals when we speak of sanctuary. We’re talking about perps not being held for Federal authorities.
I think it does make sense to make a distinction. In this administration an illegal immigrant working and minding their business is no different than an Ms 13 member. So why would the ICE agents risk their safety when they can just go entrap people with schedule appointments at the immigration office. Another point on the board so what's the difference ?
I think it does make sense to make a distinction. In this administration an illegal immigrant working and minding their business is no different than an Ms 13 member. So why would the ICE agents risk their safety when they can just go entrap people with schedule appointments at the immigration office. Another point on the board so what's the difference ?
It's true, there is no difference
My parents immigrated here legally
I would be embarrassed if they had "jumped borders"
No different than squatting.
It's actually like squatting when the original occupants are still living in the house. To come here illegally.
__________________
"The man who sleeps on the floor, can never fall out of bed." -Martin Lawrence
Just read the bill. Yeah there's no chance of this passing.
Why? Congressional bills are voted upon at the level of the US Congress, not at the level of voters from the Bronx. You don't have your usual argument of NYC "minorities" voting the rational measures down in this case. The entities voting for or against this bill are representing all the US states, ie, the same voting level at which Trump was elected a president.
Why? Congressional bills are voted upon at the level of the US Congress, not at the level of voters from the Bronx. You don't have your usual argument of NYC "minorities" voting the rational measures down in this case. The entities voting for or against this bill are representing all the US states, ie, the same voting level at which Trump was elected a president.
I would be embarrassed if they had "jumped borders"
No different than squatting.
It's actually like squatting when the original occupants are still living in the house. To come here illegally.
Your parents also immigrated in a much different time. It's basically impossible to immigrate legally from most countries now, and the administration has drastically cut the numbers allowed. Just consider the differences before you make a straight line comparison
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
