Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2007, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,232 posts, read 3,784,585 times
Reputation: 604

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexRob View Post
Thx, Tex. This is a very good, short and succinct article. It's definitely objective and I do hope everyone reads it. Because the varying elements of it and how it affects each individually differently is the reason not everyone will be completely happy with the tax. Even the people who are, today for it. If the tax ends up being another revenue generating vehicle that is only squandered on non-relevant issues, or is spent unwisely on issues that matter, then even the supporters will turn against it. Unfortunately, once the tax is in place, I doubt there will be ever a time we'll be able to remove it.

I wonder if the powers that be could have placed a time limit on collections, and after that time evaluate the tax efficacy so that we, as a community, could easily remove it later should the money be squandered?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2007, 06:03 PM
 
419 posts, read 1,399,221 times
Reputation: 193
The 0.5% transfer tax is nothing compared to the 6% I had to shell out to the realtor who sold my house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2007, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,232 posts, read 3,784,585 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by giffman View Post
The 0.5% transfer tax is nothing compared to the 6% I had to shell out to the realtor who sold my house.
Uh, sort of like comparing the apple to the pie, giff. That .5% (or whatever it could be) would be an 'additional' expense on top of what you had to shell out to the realtor (and that tax would be on the gross amount you sell the home, not the deducted amount).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2007, 05:53 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,720,158 times
Reputation: 5134
We just closed on our home in NH. Transfer fee (sales tax, in effect), was split 50-50 between buyer and seller. They are looking at increasing the tax, but it hasn't been passed yet.

It's never enough, is it, just to pass a tax. That's just a foot in the door. Once it's in place, it's soooo easy to raise it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top