Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2011, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,912,457 times
Reputation: 32530

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swampbird View Post
Tyger, where did you read that 1/3 of cancer is preventable? I was never sick a day in my life and got physicals and mammos every year until diagnosed at 44 with cancer ("clean" mammos for 4 years were false negatives).

My uncle died of colon cancer at 46. He was never sick a day in his life, excersised daily and ate plenty of fiber, etc. We had no family history.

You can't "prevent" cancer. You can try to "reduce risk", but I think that is BS when it comes to cancer. However, heart disease and diabetes are another story.
Giving a couple of examples proves nothing, except that there are exceptions, and the ones you cited are not really exceptions anyway, as they fall within the 2/3 of cancer that Tyger said is not preventable. Therefore, why do you think they refute what he said? Whether you think it is BS about reducing one's risk for cancer is irrelevant because you are obviously not a medical epidemiologist. You cite two examples; the medical researchers cite millions in careful studies which are designed to correct for various kinds of things which could throw the results off. There are indeed risk factors for some cancers; it is a proven fact, whether you "think" so or not. One of the earliest to be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt is that smoking is a risk factor for lung cancer. Your reasoning is flawed in the most fundamental way - you are looking at your own family and drawing conclusions from what you see. The amount of data you are looking at is way too small to draw any conclusions whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top