Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2013, 07:12 PM
 
43 posts, read 65,592 times
Reputation: 19

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBOSCH View Post
I lot of investors are buying rental properties with the belief that the sh#t is going to hit the fan and the stock market will collapse. Yet these same people think their tenants are going to continue paying them rent while this financial collapse occurs.

You might be able to weather that scenario if you paid cash for your rentals but those that are leveraged up to their eyeballs on these rentals are going to go bankrupt under that kind of economic meltdown.

Disagree. You gotta live somewhere. Not saying that all rental areas are good - but did rents go down in 2009?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2013, 11:14 AM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,618,487 times
Reputation: 16240
Quote:
Originally Posted by usedtobeanyer View Post
I'm getting very frustrated with the ups & downs of the market. I'm 43 and have nearly $200k in my 401. Is there an investment offering out there that "guarantees" a 5% annual return? I know that may be ambitious and I know the guarantee part will probably make this impossible, but wondering if anyone has any thoughts.

My feeling at this point is if I can find a relatively risk free investment that offers this kind of return, I would move all of my retirement savings to this.
Well, you aren't guaranteed to make 5% each year, but if you go 100% equity and don't retire until 70 or so, you have a virtual guarantee of making at least 6% annualized (i.e. there has never been a period that long in history that didn't perform that well.)

Three caveats - first, avoid mutual funds with expense over 0.5% per year - if necessary, roll to an ira to get away from toxic high-fee funds. Second, DO NOT SELL if you see the value tank. SIT TIGHT....it will come back up and then some. Third, diversify across sectors (construction, consumer retail, energy, housing, etc.) , capitalization (small cap, mid and large), and countries (domestic and foreign), so if one part of the market performs poorly, the others can make up for it and then some.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 04:18 PM
 
106,855 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80294
that guaranteed equity return may be no longer historically represented .

we never had conditions going forward in the equity markets as we have today so you cannot historically compare any time frame.

in the 146 years shillers data goes back we never ever had conditions of high stock valuations and historically low interest rates at the same time , a bad combo going forward.

for 13 years we had next to no progress. stock dividends and interest rates are related and since rates are low dividends will be lower than historically and they alone account for 33% of the markets returns.

historically if markets fell 15% a 50/50 mix was whole again in 2 years.

it can be many many years before even a 2% real return is a sure thing .

nothing is a sure thing anymore as the new normal is very different.

i am a guy who believes in equity investing too as i was always 80-100% invested up until the last few years as i get ready to retire but i think the new norm may be very different from the past data we saw..

Last edited by mathjak107; 11-24-2013 at 05:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 06:59 AM
 
4,006 posts, read 6,047,299 times
Reputation: 3897
Wonder where the OP is today compared to 2011 when he had $200k in his 401K. Hopefully he rode the wave because it's been a good one for several years now.

IF there were any such thing at a guaranteed return in an equities and IF I had to put some money somewhere, I'd go with ContraFund. I have and continue to be heavily invested in this fund going on 15 years now. I'm a Will Danoff believer and trust him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 04:22 PM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,618,487 times
Reputation: 16240
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
that guaranteed equity return may be no longer historically represented .

we never had conditions going forward in the equity markets as we have today so you cannot historically compare any time frame.

in the 146 years shillers data goes back we never ever had conditions of high stock valuations and historically low interest rates at the same time , a bad combo going forward.

for 13 years we had next to no progress. stock dividends and interest rates are related and since rates are low dividends will be lower than historically and they alone account for 33% of the markets returns.

historically if markets fell 15% a 50/50 mix was whole again in 2 years.

it can be many many years before even a 2% real return is a sure thing .

nothing is a sure thing anymore as the new normal is very different.

i am a guy who believes in equity investing too as i was always 80-100% invested up until the last few years as i get ready to retire but i think the new norm may be very different from the past data we saw..
This is precisely why I said to diversify. Your analysis is based only on one country and only on the large caps. If you look at the larger picture there is nothing really all that crazy going on right now in the overall equity markets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 04:51 PM
 
106,855 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80294
oh yes there is a problem now , show us a point in time where rates are zero and stocks are fully valued. you can not .

the problem is that is a hellish combo for future gains for quite a long time going forward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2013, 09:07 AM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,618,487 times
Reputation: 16240
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
oh yes there is a problem now , show us a point in time where rates are zero and stocks are fully valued. you can not .

the problem is that is a hellish combo for future gains for quite a long time going forward.
Rates are not zero everywhere - so yet again, the analysis fails to consider the other parts of the world (which have 96% of the population, of course).

Sovereign Bond Interest Rate Spreads, basis points over US Treasuries - All Countries - Quandl

If you diversify internationally, why do only US (only 4% of the people) rates matter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2013, 10:32 AM
 
106,855 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80294
International bonds have taken a bad hit . We dumped most of them at this point but we did lose money in them this year. we moved back to equities and have since recovered the losses.

Spreads have been growing because the bonds values have been taking a hit . the international bond market is very risky. with world rates having no where to go but up the out look is no better than here.

almost every industrialized nation has historically low rates .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 11:29 AM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,618,487 times
Reputation: 16240
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
International bonds have taken a bad hit . We dumped most of them at this point but we did lose money in them this year. we moved back to equities and have since recovered the losses.

Spreads have been growing because the bonds values have been taking a hit . the international bond market is very risky. with world rates having no where to go but up the out look is no better than here.

almost every industrialized nation has historically low rates .
'Bond values taking a hit' is the same thing as 'interest rates rising'. It'll happen everywhere once investors start demanding more return.

Over the long run since a drop in prices now means your reinvested dividends (or interest) can buy more shares and increase your dividend income over the long run, a market crash after you buy actually is a good thing IF you will hold for a VERY long time such as 30 years. Of course, it would be even better to buy after a big crash, but not at the expense of having your cash eroded by inflation while waiting for a crash that may be 10 or 15 years away...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top