Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2014, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,244,536 times
Reputation: 6243

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
If younger people make this kind of mistake they presumably still have several decades to make it right. For a 60 year old woman to take on that kind of debt is colossally irresponsible.
Socially, it is irresponsible. But people don't act socially--they act for their own personal benefit. And think about it: why not just "live for today" and borrow and rack up debt (like our esteemed leaders in Washington)? You get years and years of a much higher quality of life, and only pay back a small amount each month. With interest perpetually locked at historic lows, you can live VERY well for a VERY long time, before compound interest and total debt makes your monthly credit bills too high to handle. And when you get to that point, just declare bankruptcy and wipe the debt off the books (and for non-forgiveable debt, like Big Government's confiscation, you get an easy payment plan that lowers the monthly payment).

That's how millions of Americans have done it, and it seems to have worked out very well for them. Why would they be scared of the only downside of bankruptcy--7 years without being able to get more credit? That just means 7 years living like they would have if they were fiscally responsible.

Compare that to the case of the "responsible" person, who lives very frugally all their life and has a small nest egg, plus some investments with an income stream in retirement (like annuities). That means the government assistance that you MIGHT have gotten will be minimized or denied altogether based on asset and income testing (and this will only get MUCH worse in the future, as Big Government desperately tries to hide the fact that they already SPENT all those tax revenues that were supposed to take care of the Baby Boom's retirement costs).

I was recently reading about a frugal elderly woman who had never made a lot of money. Realizing the complexity of SS, she called the Social Security office, but could do no more than answer simplistic questions (and they are likely to be WRONG anyway). So she went to a financial planner for retirement planning advice. The guy she went to gave her the Party Line of the benefits of delaying taking Social Security (a higher check if/when you start collecting), so she lived like a pauper and did not file for SS until age 70. We all know that one drawback to delaying SS benefits is that if you die before your new SS retirement age, you would get NOTHING back for the hundreds of thousands in Social Security taxes you pay over a lifetime of work.

But it turns out there was another HUGE downside to delaying SS benefits that nobody told her about: that the higher SS benefit made her totally ineligible for other government assistance programs that would have allowed her to live quite well (I can't find the article now; someone post the link if you find it). She was over the income limit by less than $5 a month, but there is absolutely no way she could arrange to get LESS of a Social Security check. She ended up living in poverty for not only her working years, but ALSO during her retirement years. Here's a link to some other pitfalls of Social Security retirement planning: 44 Social Security 'Secrets' All Baby Boomers and Millions of Current Recipients Need to Know - Revised! - Forbes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2014, 02:38 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,443,598 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
This is why people hate the boomers
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
will significantly and negatively impact my future economic well-being, and that of my children. That is where I draw the line.
So you hate, and draw the line with, about 75 million people?
Or are you looking for someone to blame when your plans don't go as you think they should?
Hint - people can plan all they want. The results (life) are never guaranteed.

As for her age and getting loans and being in debt ... I'm pretty sure that under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, it's illegal for a creditor to discriminate against any applicant because of age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 04:32 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 36,985,345 times
Reputation: 34541
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
I can think of nothing to justify a 60 year old woman taking on $200k of debt for a job with median pay of $42k.
But the point is, most 60 year olds should be in a position to retire or semi retire so that they won't feel the need to take on said debt in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 04:38 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 36,985,345 times
Reputation: 34541
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Generations after the boomers have become the entitlement generation ;Plain and simple. They do not earn their own way but rely on free stuff at young age. Even Obama admits they have not produced the replacement scientist and highly technical people needed and our education ranks lower and lower in the world.
That is generally true, but it is the Boomers who started this trend toward the entitlement mindset with coddling kids, giving them everything they want, being your kid's friend, etc. I understand not all Boomers embraced this mindset, but they were the first generation to do so, and it hasn't turned out well for them or their kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 06:03 PM
 
1,855 posts, read 3,612,123 times
Reputation: 2151
No, it was actually the boomers who embraced the 'greed is good-we deserve to live the good life NOW' philosophy that took off in the 1980s. That's when the country began to circle the drain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
That is generally true, but it is the Boomers who started this trend toward the entitlement mindset with coddling kids, giving them everything they want, being your kid's friend, etc. I understand not all Boomers embraced this mindset, but they were the first generation to do so, and it hasn't turned out well for them or their kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 06:09 PM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,606 posts, read 47,717,056 times
Reputation: 48321
So you say there are people... who you claim HATE an entire generation because a bank gave one older lady loans to further her education?

How many besides you?

:::shaking head:::
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 10:21 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
No, it was actually the boomers who embraced the 'greed is good-we deserve to live the good life NOW' philosophy that took off in the 1980s. That's when the country began to circle the drain.
This. Greed is good and never, ever plan for the future or even make an attempt to pay for what you want today. Just run up the bill and let someone else pay it. More people need to wake up and realize that the attitude shift in the 1980s is what has led us to where we are today.

And now we find ourselves unable to fund higher education like we used to, unable to offer pensions at all (certainly not like we used to), unable to pay for basic public services.

And the people who squandered it all have the nerve to rant and rave about how the people they stuck with the bill "have become the entitlement generation" and "do not earn their own way but rely on free stuff."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2014, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 61,009,909 times
Reputation: 101088
I was going to respond seriously and thoughtfully to this thread, but after reading through a few pages, I decided, "Nyahhh, I'll just poke my eyes out with a knitting needle instead."

Honestly, the shortsightedness of some people is amazing. Get this - Karma is a really _itch. One day YOU will be middle aged and YOUR kids and grandkids and their peers will be vilifying and hating on you, and blaming you for their woes. It's one of human nature's basic defaults - can't you at least TRY to rise above it?


Mike and the Mechanics - The Living Years ( HQ sound - with Lyrics ) - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2014, 04:31 PM
 
893 posts, read 886,752 times
Reputation: 1585
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
'I

Meet Nancie Eichengreen, 60 years of age. In 2012, after getting laid off from her legal secretary job, she decided to 'reinvent' herself, and went back to school (Yeshiva, an expensive private university) to pursue a master's in social work. She got the degree, but is still jobless and now $200k in debt.



The median salary for a social worker is $42k. I can't even begin to conceive what this woman was thinking.
what an ignorantly broad statement. You could say the same thing about any generation.


The baby boomers have done a lot to hurt their legacy. No doubt.

But, if we are making broad statements, this current generation of college age people would be more likely to spend $200k on a masters in social work than just about any other generation.



It all comes down to personal responsibility and making good choices. Something that fewer and fewer people in this world are willing to take. No matter what age they are.


It's no wonder though. When our "leaders", which are sadly politicians, are constantly trying to encourage people to blame someone else for all of their problems, it's inevitable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2014, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley AZ
8,775 posts, read 11,914,363 times
Reputation: 11485
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
I was going to respond seriously and thoughtfully to this thread, but after reading through a few pages, I decided, "Nyahhh, I'll just poke my eyes out with a knitting needle instead."

Honestly, the shortsightedness of some people is amazing. Get this - Karma is a really _itch. One day YOU will be middle aged and YOUR kids and grandkids and their peers will be vilifying and hating on you, and blaming you for their woes. It's one of human nature's basic defaults - can't you at least TRY to rise above it?

[youtube]gUdiQWxps5E[/youtube
Mike and the Mechanics - The Living Years ( HQ sound - with Lyrics ) - YouTube
Wouldn't let me rep you for this post and video but wanted to say it is PERFECT! So truthful...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top