Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2021, 09:20 AM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,310,746 times
Reputation: 45727

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1insider View Post
How much bigger was the $45K than what she would have received without the $150K buy-in? My first reaction was that's a great deal but I'm assuming she would have gotten maybe $35K or so without the buy-in?
She wouldn't have qualified for a pension at all. It was either buy the five year service credit or say goodbye to a pension totally. With her life expectancy, paying for the service credit and getting the pension was the only way to go.

 
Old 08-16-2021, 09:27 AM
 
4,323 posts, read 6,285,595 times
Reputation: 6126
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltarMadness9 View Post
If you start at 25-30 and you invest say 6K a year in a 401K plus get another 2K in match - you'll have around 1.3 million dollars at 60



so why do so few people have million + in a 401K?
I see these statistics and they're always misleading. Nobody stays at one company their entire career anymore. Most people (including myself) have 401ks from multiple employers, that we rollover to IRA's when leaving the company. Why these IRA numbers aren't included in the calculations are beyond me.

Aside from that, too many people live paycheck to paycheck in this country. They live above their means and want the latest and greatest of everything. They aren't willing to delay gratification somewhat in favor of a long term goal. For those reasons, they're constantly struggling, irrespective of their income levels.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 09:52 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,224,257 times
Reputation: 18170
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
She wouldn't have qualified for a pension at all. It was either buy the five year service credit or say goodbye to a pension totally. With her life expectancy, paying for the service credit and getting the pension was the only way to go.
In that case it was an epic deal. Well done.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 09:56 AM
 
306 posts, read 203,480 times
Reputation: 746
I think it's partly lack of education, partly the fact that many jobs don't come with a 401k, and partly the fact that for many people the priority is buying property. I know this forum is full of old people who are convinced that everyone can be a 401k millionaire and a homeowner if they just stopped buying avocado toast and iphones, but I think for many young people today, their priorities are more in the here and now. The gap between average wages and property prices in most markets have widened to historic levels, and people either just don't have anything to spare, or they think it would be better put towards a down payment.

the other big factor is education. people just don't understand compounding, and they don't understand that 'risk' is just a measure of volatility and not an inherently bad thing. I have a friend who is 38 and has all his retirement money in bonds, simply because he doesn't want to take 'risk' with his savings. I've tried to point out that if his savings compound by 8% a year for 10 years, even if we had a 20% down year he'd still be way ahead, but he just doesn't get it.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
4,222 posts, read 4,746,812 times
Reputation: 3228
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorporateCowboy View Post
It's all relative to what one has. That said, while accruing $1M for retirement (by the age of 60, per the OP) could absolutely be considered sound financial planning for many, it isn't 'wealth' in and of itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorporateCowboy View Post
There's a difference between a $1M net worth at 30 vs. $1M for retirement (to live on for 30 years) at 60. The former has a real shot at accruing 'wealth'.
Sorry if I completely missed this but what is your definition to what it means then to have wealth?
 
Old 08-16-2021, 10:05 AM
 
Location: USA
9,136 posts, read 6,191,523 times
Reputation: 29994
Retired Baby Boomer here. For most of my working life, there was no Roth, no IRA, no 401k, not even a regular savings plan at work that had a match. These tax advantaged vehicles came very late in my working career.

While the standard comment is that employers provided pensions to us, in reality the amount of pension income is very small unless you were a government or railroad worker. "The median annual pension benefit ranges between $9,262 for private pensions to $22,172 for a state or local pension, and $30,061 for a federal government pension and $24,592 for a railroad pension." https://www.newretirement.com/retire...o-you-compare/

The fact that I could afford to retire at all is due to having been raised by parents who lived during the Depression who stressed wants versus needs.

I was taught to save, not spend. Never buy anything the first time you see it. Take the time to think about it. If it's gone when you go back, that's ok. You lived without it before, no major crisis here.

Birthdays and holidays are opportunities to celebrate with family and friends; presents and things are not needed to wish each other happy birthday. Just a hug is needed. [pre-covid obviously].

Maybe more hugs and fewer I-phones would help.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 10:35 AM
 
306 posts, read 203,480 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lillie767 View Post
Retired Baby Boomer here. For most of my working life, there was no Roth, no IRA, no 401k, not even a regular savings plan at work that had a match. These tax advantaged vehicles came very late in my working career.

While the standard comment is that employers provided pensions to us, in reality the amount of pension income is very small unless you were a government or railroad worker. "The median annual pension benefit ranges between $9,262 for private pensions to $22,172 for a state or local pension, and $30,061 for a federal government pension and $24,592 for a railroad pension." https://www.newretirement.com/retire...o-you-compare/

The fact that I could afford to retire at all is due to having been raised by parents who lived during the Depression who stressed wants versus needs.

I was taught to save, not spend. Never buy anything the first time you see it. Take the time to think about it. If it's gone when you go back, that's ok. You lived without it before, no major crisis here.

Birthdays and holidays are opportunities to celebrate with family and friends; presents and things are not needed to wish each other happy birthday. Just a hug is needed. [pre-covid obviously].

Maybe more hugs and fewer I-phones would help.
Are your views based on anything other than the standard boomer sense of self-satisfaction?

Adjusting for inflation, median income has increased 29% since 1960, whereas median house prices have increased by 121%.

I know you want to believe that it's all due to your moral superiority, but the fact is the generation of today are not playing on the same playing field as you were. Not buying an iphone isn't the key to affording the basic 'american dream' that prior generations were able to.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 11:43 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
The method of saving and investing for retirement is actually extremely simple. However, human nature does not want to do what is simple.

No matter how much or how well you explain it, most people will not do it.
This has been my experience as well. Even with myself, I sub-optimized the investment part. Fortunately, I got the saving part right. Most people get both wrong.
 
Old 08-16-2021, 11:44 AM
 
106,683 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
Many of us are so far ahead of what we even earned in the 1970s so not sure where this 29% is coming from ..

My wages were up 10x since the 1970s
 
Old 08-16-2021, 11:47 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
What employer doesn’t have a 401k plan? Even McDonalds, Walmart and Starbucks have 401k plans.

Young people are inclined to talk about all kinds of ways they spend their money, travel to places and splurge on things. How often do you go to a party where people discuss their retirement accounts? It is not considered to be the sexiest topic of conversation.
Lots of small employers don't have 401k type plans. Not everyone works for a big company or the government. Something like 50% of the workforce doesn't have access to a 401k. That shouldn't be an excuse not to save and invest, but it is a legitimate problem. And it usually it's the lowest paid segment of the workforce the hardest.

We really need uinversal 401ks. I don't think employers should be forced to match, but it would be very easy to set them up based on the federal government's TSP plan for its employees. It really would not be that expensive, either.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top