Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-13-2012, 02:19 PM
 
943 posts, read 1,323,201 times
Reputation: 900

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Info Guy View Post
That is very impressive considering you live in the Bay Area. My favorite spot and hopefully will go back and retire there. I grew up in South San Jose.
From my point of view the most important lessons that allowed me to succeed in this way were:

-- Ignore both the doomsayers and the wild optimists. The economy's going to do what it's going to do. Focus on your own situation.

-- Think about the long run. It took almost twenty years for me to build my savings. I try to put something in every single month. One month's savings may not seem like a lot, but it all adds up over many years. This is another reason to ignore news about the economy. Who knows what it's going to be like ten, twenty years from now? But I do know that if I put more away this month, I'll have more down the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:09 PM
 
30,906 posts, read 37,038,212 times
Reputation: 34558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatornation View Post
Net worth is the best estimate. Home values have always been stable with a few exceptions. A swing of 20-50k in home value would have minimal impact.

Someone who rents and has a million in the bank if no more of a millionaire than one who has 500k in the bank and owns a 500k home.
Maybe, but maybe not. Someone renting a simple apartment vs a house has lower utilities costs, and property taxes and repairs included in their rent payments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:15 PM
 
5,500 posts, read 10,534,074 times
Reputation: 2303
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
Maybe, but maybe not. Someone renting a simple apartment vs a house has lower utilities costs, and property taxes and repairs included in their rent payments.
Renting an apartment is not comparable to renting a house. Of course it's less as it's cheaper to rent or purchase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:17 PM
 
30,906 posts, read 37,038,212 times
Reputation: 34558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
I know a miser who "made" millionaire. He reuses pieces of aluminum, and will eat something even past its "prime." He has the same furniture and items that he's had since, oh, decades ago. That's how he's lived his entire life.
Oh, here we go again with the extreme examples . It's entirely possible for most people to become wealthy (or at least financially comfortable) without eating rotten food and reusing tin foil (although I don't see anything wrong with reusing tin foil if it's clean).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:23 PM
 
30,906 posts, read 37,038,212 times
Reputation: 34558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keim View Post
You forgot number 5: Budget properly so as to save an adequate amount monthly, and wisely invest it.
I might add an investment in a pretty plain vanilla mutual fund that invests in a mix of stocks and bonds can add up over a lifetime.

$200 a month into a fund like Vanguard Wellington (at the rate of return of 6.98%...which is the rate of return over the last 15 years, below average compared to historical standards) would yield:

$244,000 after 30 years

and

$525,000 after 40 years.


Vanguard Wellington Inv (VWELX) Fund Performance and Returns


Most people can find $200 a month to invest if they really want to. Most just don't want to.

FinAid | Calculators | Savings Growth Projector
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:27 PM
 
30,906 posts, read 37,038,212 times
Reputation: 34558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatornation View Post
Excellent link...and I just had to post this excerpt:

"...our ideas about the relationship between money and happiness are misguided. In research we conducted with a national sample of Americans, people thought that their life satisfaction would double if they made $55,000 instead of $25,000: more than twice as much money, twice as much happiness. But our data showed that people who earned $55,000 were just 9 percent more satisfied than those making $25,000. Nine percent beats zero percent, but it’s still kind of a letdown when you were expecting a 100 percent return."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:34 PM
 
30,906 posts, read 37,038,212 times
Reputation: 34558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
No one gets rich on that, unless any of the 1-4 are in place.

Those who get rich honestly (and really, a great deal of what is related to Wall Street cannot be considered honest, good, decent, etc.) can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
Depends on how you define "rich". If you're talking Hollywood Celebrity level rich, then possibly.

If you're talking about being able to live a basic middle class lifestyle (notice I said basic) without needing to work, then that, while not common, is attainable for most. It's just that most people are like you and complain rather than taking any kind of constructive action. To attain this level of financial independence requires a decent (but not necessarily above average) income, and a planner's mindset. That means, no kids out of wedlock (maybe no kids at all), no messy and expensive divorces, saving 10% or more for the long term once you get your first decent paying job, etc.

It seems engineers are particularly good at saving money. The personal finance blogs are dominated by engineers. The rest of the population doesn't seem to care about planning their lives, but they like to complain a lot about the rich and the fact they are broke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:36 PM
 
4,338 posts, read 7,516,043 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdJS View Post
From my point of view the most important lessons that allowed me to succeed in this way were:

-- Ignore both the doomsayers and the wild optimists. The economy's going to do what it's going to do. Focus on your own situation.

-- Think about the long run. It took almost twenty years for me to build my savings. I try to put something in every single month. One month's savings may not seem like a lot, but it all adds up over many years. This is another reason to ignore news about the economy. Who knows what it's going to be like ten, twenty years from now? But I do know that if I put more away this month, I'll have more down the road.
Putting in $17K in 401K and $5K in Roth IRA for the year is automatic for me. What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:37 PM
 
4,338 posts, read 7,516,043 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I might add an investment in a pretty plain vanilla mutual fund that invests in a mix of stocks and bonds can add up over a lifetime.

$200 a month into a fund like Vanguard Wellington (at the rate of return of 6.98%...which is the rate of return over the last 15 years, below average compared to historical standards) would yield:

$244,000 after 30 years

and

$525,000 after 40 years.


Vanguard Wellington Inv (VWELX) Fund Performance and Returns


Most people can find $200 a month to invest if they really want to. Most just don't want to.

FinAid | Calculators | Savings Growth Projector
Right, and studies show that an average family spends $500 a year in lotto tickets lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2012, 09:41 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,195,741 times
Reputation: 12921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Info Guy View Post
Putting in $17K in 401K and $5K in Roth IRA for the year is automatic for me. What do you think?
I think you're on the right track. My 401k and Roth IRA make up a large chunk of my net worth and I got it there my maxing out my 401k to the $49K cap and my Traditional IRA/Roth IRA (I switch back and forth depending on circumstances) to the $5k cap. The more you can put away, the better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top