Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2019, 12:30 AM
 
2,774 posts, read 5,728,764 times
Reputation: 5095

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ Manager View Post
Ignore the peanut gallery. Anyone who thinks HOAs in this state are toothless is a moron. We just went through this with a guy who put up a permitted building in his back yard in my HOA. He has a corner lot so loads of room and the HOA denied the building but he started it anyway. They were given a cease and desist when framing began and the tradesmen stopped building right away. The permitted building is now torn down and back to nothing after they took it through the courts, which took ages and was very expensive.

Permits don't mean you can bypass the wishes of an HOA.

Love to hear more details. Got any kind of link. When you say expensive how much are we talking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2019, 01:43 AM
 
2,373 posts, read 1,916,532 times
Reputation: 3983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post
Bravo! If the OP actually owned the neighbor's property, she would probably have a legitimate case ... however, more than likely, she doesn't have any kind of ownership stake of the neighboring property, and she certainly doesn't own the "mountain". Therefore, she either needs to put up with it, or move.



Ohhhh, those precious mountain vieewws. Seriously, if gawking at a silly mountain is the only thing that keeps a person emotionally stable, then there is something seriously wrong mentally. If the OP lived in a remote area, a small town, or even in an exurban part of the Phoenix area (such as Fountain Hills), then I could possibly empathize with her ... however, she lives in a neighborhood in a large city. Big difference!
Every place I've ever lived, same with anyone I know....if you have a nice view, which equates to nice location, you pay for it. The better the view, whether water or mountain or valley, or famous city, or restored historic street, the higher the price. And I've never had the experience of living anywhere where that issue was disregarded carelessly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 04:38 AM
 
9,746 posts, read 11,169,688 times
Reputation: 8488
While I am sympathetic to the ops story, there are all kinds of things that control property value that are out of our control. Like the neighbors who don't take care of their place and drag their neighbors values down. Or maybe a road expansion that causes more road noise. Or in my case, Luke adding 400 more flights a month and/or if they change their flight patterns. Or maybe section 8 housing is going in close to your home. I can think of another 100 examples which may include your mountain views being obstructed. Most every single reason is under the umbrella of "suck it up buttercup" unless the city or HOA has rules written ahead of time. That's the reality.

If the op hires an attorney, it might be a smart idea to somehow make sure the attorney doesn't take the case knowing it is a long shot to line his pockets. If I was the op, I would (calmly) visit the neighbors HOA to see if he can find an angle. Try to get an HOA employee to see your point of view; I'd play the age card (i.e. act a little feeble). Going isn't the right approach Ask if the permitted city house expansion also got an approval from the HOA. If the answer is yes, I would put my money on the op being SOL.

No one likes to be stepped on. Emotional distress occurs to most people when that happens. But if you take on a fight and you are prone to emotional distress, it might drag you down harder and faster than looking at the back of a newly modified 2nd story home. In life, pick your battles carefully and know your own limits. In reality, the op will probably have two options. Live with the new view or move. Worrying about it will be much more painful to his heart and mind than the subjective newly obstructed view.

Last edited by MN-Born-n-Raised; 03-05-2019 at 04:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 01:42 PM
 
Location: The Disputed Lands
843 posts, read 565,973 times
Reputation: 1649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post
Ohhhh, those precious mountain vieewws. Seriously, if gawking at a silly mountain is the only thing that keeps a person emotionally stable, then there is something seriously wrong mentally. If the OP lived in a remote area, a small town, or even in an exurban part of the Phoenix area (such as Fountain Hills), then I could possibly empathize with her ... however, she lives in a neighborhood in a large city. Big difference!
This is a little much. No need to say that. There is nothing remotely surprising or mentally unstable about someone who lived in a house with a nice mountain view for >50 yrs, and is now very upset and emotional about someone changing their own little slice of the world. I'd probably feel the same way, and you would too if you are honest. It doesn't really matter where the house is located. Not saying that I am against property owner's rights to build the addition, but give the OP a break with the nastiness. If you had just left out the insulting part, then your points are valid.

Last edited by KO Stradivarius; 03-05-2019 at 01:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
3,365 posts, read 5,243,031 times
Reputation: 4205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Madolf View Post
Love to hear more details. Got any kind of link. When you say expensive how much are we talking?
I could link you the court case but there is no information there, if you have ever looked at a court case online you will see it just lists the actions taken with the court (filing dates, service dates, decisions, etc.) without any actual case details. My HOA filed 8 cases last year and has already filed 2 so far this year, most HOAs sue like crazy to force payments. This incident was a $5,732.85 judgment plus interest, about $1500 in legal fees and the rest was fines and late fees.

Go to this link and under the business name punch in your HOA and you will see how often your HOA sues it's residents, and click into a few of them and you will see there is no details about the cases. Unless the suit makes the news, and most don't, there really isn't any link to share on a particular case.

Find A Case

This link is another court search that contains mostly crimes, if not only crimes. Most HOA cases are filed in the county courts.

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/pub...aselookup.aspx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Willo Historic District, Phoenix, AZ
3,187 posts, read 5,745,978 times
Reputation: 3658
I'm no lawyer, but when buying property there are deed restrictions (AKA covenants, codes and restrictions) associated with that property which do tell you what you can and can't do with your property. That is usually what an HOA is enforcing when they choose to do something, but individual property owners can sue to enforce them as well. They can and do have precedence over zoning classifications, building permits, etc. Typically people sign them unknowingly when buying the house but later get all pissy and libertarian when asked to abide by them. Some are superceded by law, for example, the deed restrictions associated with our 1941 house says that no Mexican can reside in it unless employed as a servant. Others become invalid when not enforced. I once put a political sign in our yard in NE Phoenix and was told by the neighborhood association that the CC&Rs restricted signs unless posted to sell the house. I consulted an attorney and learned that, since many of the homes in the neighborhood had signs that said "protected by ADT" or something similar, that forbidding mine would be selective enforcement and therefore wouldn't fly. The interesting thing was that without the selective enforcement loophole, the rule actually would have overridden my first amendment right to free speech.

If I had the problem I would take a look at the CC&Rs and see if they say anything about obstructing views. Probably a longshot, but worth looking into.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 04:25 PM
 
4,624 posts, read 9,281,299 times
Reputation: 4983
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbenjamin View Post
I'm no lawyer, but when buying property there are deed restrictions (AKA covenants, codes and restrictions) associated with that property which do tell you what you can and can't do with your property. That is usually what an HOA is enforcing when they choose to do something, but individual property owners can sue to enforce them as well. They can and do have precedence over zoning classifications, building permits, etc. Typically people sign them unknowingly when buying the house but later get all pissy and libertarian when asked to abide by them. Some are superceded by law, for example, the deed restrictions associated with our 1941 house says that no Mexican can reside in it unless employed as a servant. Others become invalid when not enforced. I once put a political sign in our yard in NE Phoenix and was told by the neighborhood association that the CC&Rs restricted signs unless posted to sell the house. I consulted an attorney and learned that, since many of the homes in the neighborhood had signs that said "protected by ADT" or something similar, that forbidding mine would be selective enforcement and therefore wouldn't fly. The interesting thing was that without the selective enforcement loophole, the rule actually would have overridden my first amendment right to free speech.

If I had the problem I would take a look at the CC&Rs and see if they say anything about obstructing views. Probably a longshot, but worth looking into.
I doubt there's an HOA or CC&R's in this older subdivision but I could be wrong. HOA's are more prevalent in houses built in the past 35-40 years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 04:33 PM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,293,931 times
Reputation: 41015
Everyone has a nice mountain view until someone else builds behind them. Cities grow and i doubt very much a mountain view is going to stop the city from issuing building permits. Does anyone seriously think a city is going to stop growing because someone's mountain view is obstructed? We're not talking about a view of the ocean here from a hill top. There's no mention of an HOA. The vast majority of people don't live in HOA communities. If that were the case, the plans would have already been submitted to the HOA and they they don't care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2019, 06:13 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,964,244 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by asufan View Post
I doubt there's an HOA or CC&R's in this older subdivision but I could be wrong. HOA's are more prevalent in houses built in the past 35-40 years
There are CC&Rs on almost every house in the Phoenix metro unless it’s 100+ years old. Probably no HOA though.

Might also look into the zoning for the area to see if there’s a compliance issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2019, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
5,649 posts, read 5,969,862 times
Reputation: 8317
Wow, no snide anti-NIMBY comments? This lady's poor case is a reason why many people choose to poo-poo proposals for tall buildings, and I feel bad for her. I mean, if you live downtown (or near to), then being a NIMBY is ridiculous, but people that buy homes near the mountains and get their views blocked is maddening! Best of luck to you, OP. I don't think much can be done. I know you've lived there for 57 years, but maybe its time to sell and find another place where blocking views is strictly prohibited?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top