Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2010, 12:45 AM
 
Location: Kittanning
4,692 posts, read 9,037,720 times
Reputation: 3668

Advertisements

Hope you enjoy. This is my tribute to the lost (demolished) historic buildings of Pittsburgh.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVAoNF8x-kI


To see my photo tours of Pittsburgh, visit: http://historicpittsburgh.blogspot.com

Last edited by PreservationPioneer; 11-06-2010 at 01:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2010, 11:06 AM
 
6,613 posts, read 16,590,323 times
Reputation: 4787
Nice job! I love looking at these old buildings. What a loss.

Your phototour reminds me of a link posted a couple months ago on the Minneapolis/St Paul forum. Like Pgh, Mpls also did lots of "slum clearance" in the 1950s/60s, demolishing entire neighborhoods. The film this link leads to shows mostly decrepit buildings, unlike the classic beauties yours shows.

Minnesota Video Vault | Home
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,823,631 times
Reputation: 2973
all cities were demolishing themselves susidized by federal funds (title one) . sometimrs for highways, sometimes for garagrs, sometimes for public housing, etc. it was a time when planners and the feds were basically out to wipe out urban living. some are more sad than others. the old post office for a garage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 06:48 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,022,351 times
Reputation: 2911
They didn't value the buildings, which to them were just old and ugly and not yet historic, and they were also convinced that cities needed to become a combination of highrises and autocentric-infrastructure in order to survive. That is how you get to absurdities like tearing down what we now would recognized as significant and irreplacable historic buildings for things like parking garages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,227 posts, read 16,823,631 times
Reputation: 2973
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
They didn't value the buildings, which to them were just old and ugly and not yet historic, and they were also convinced that cities needed to become a combination of highrises and autocentric-infrastructure in order to survive. That is how you get to absurdities like tearing down what we now would recognized as significant and irreplacable historic buildings for things like parking garages.
many of these projects were unpopular at the time which was how the preservationent movement came abouy. certain plannets beleived they were doing the right thing but most importantly, they had federal.money to play sim city with real life buildings. federal policy from the new deal on was essentially antiurban from red lining to the idea the economu could be propped up by forcefully remaking the way americans lived. certainly by the sixties it was clear the policies were failures but it still took a long time to stop. jane jacobs rip
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 07:27 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,022,351 times
Reputation: 2911
The feds undoubtedly played a role, but it was also certain local elites--particularly within the interconnected business and political communities--that pushed this vision in cities like Pittsburgh. I agree other locals--including some elites as well--were often opposed.

It should also be noted a lot of this was flat out racist and xenophobic. For example, some of the relevant housing developments in cities like New York were originally white-only--somewhat ironic, given that cheaper versions of those ideas would later be used for low-income urban housing projects. Generally, some elites openly promoted these master-planned city visions as a clean WASP-friendly alternative to chaotic old cities full of dirty foreigners and minorities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 11:15 AM
 
6,613 posts, read 16,590,323 times
Reputation: 4787
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
The feds undoubtedly played a role, but it was also certain local elites--particularly within the interconnected business and political communities--that pushed this vision in cities like Pittsburgh. I agree other locals--including some elites as well--were often opposed.

It should also be noted a lot of this was flat out racist and xenophobic. For example, some of the relevant housing developments in cities like New York were originally white-only--somewhat ironic, given that cheaper versions of those ideas would later be used for low-income urban housing projects. Generally, some elites openly promoted these master-planned city visions as a clean WASP-friendly alternative to chaotic old cities full of dirty foreigners and minorities.
I agree. It was definitely "government" who orchestrated this at the federal level, but it was business interests (developers, road builders, investors) who ran the show at the local level. Many of the former "slums" are now freeways, parking lots and vast, unpopulated wastelands of incredibly ugly architecture that is underutilized from an economic point of view. Meanwhile, the slum simply shifted to other neighborhoods that had been viable, blue collar, forcing those who lived there out to the burbs, creating new slums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 05:35 PM
 
Location: ADK via WV
6,080 posts, read 9,110,796 times
Reputation: 2599
That was depressing!

I love some of the newer buildings in the Pittsburgh Area, but if they had to tear those beautiful ones down, then it wasn't worth it!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 07:06 PM
 
112 posts, read 162,048 times
Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
They didn't value the buildings, which to them were just old and ugly and not yet historic, and they were also convinced that cities needed to become a combination of highrises and autocentric-infrastructure in order to survive. That is how you get to absurdities like tearing down what we now would recognized as significant and irreplacable historic buildings for things like parking garages.
Maybe one day we'll revere parking garages.

Some of these losses were architectural tragedies, but sometimes I think you do need progress and turnover. The Exposition buildings still up were empty (aside from being used as the auto pound) and weren't situated on an ideal spot next to the river. I'll take the park area over that. Mellon Square, for what its worth, seems like a better incarnation now than what it would've been if it hadn't changed (we have enough empty storefronts along Forbes as is). The Wabash terminal, though probably even more gorgeous on the inside than the outside, was still a train terminal that was, in general, out of use (though it'd be nice to have that as the Gateway Center T terminal...you listening Port Authority? build a mini revival version of that).

Having said that, surely all of us will think of a swear word anytime we walk by Saks Fifth Avenue from now on.

And even though it isn't in downtown...seriously, the Syria Mosque in '91? Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2010, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Kittanning
4,692 posts, read 9,037,720 times
Reputation: 3668
Some of the buildings I didn't fit into my video include the Jenkins Arcade, the Colonial Annex Hotel, and of course the Syria Mosque.

But there's really no way to do justice to the countless street-level historic buildings that have been lost, especially in terms of downtown's once-prominent residential buildings (small row-houses).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top