Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would say that given King's political leanings this is probably appropriate.
Few people here on CD are old enough to remember anything about MLK's associations with known Communists and the backing he received from them. It's all out there on the internet, folks, if you want to do some research.
An American icon should be memorialized using American-quarried stone and artistically carved by a natural-born American-citizen. Not by an enemy of this nation. That's the principle.
You can stop deflecting now.
How is asking a question deflecting? I asked a direct question of something you wrote.
You can stop over-using defensive phrases used as editorial comments (like "you're deflecting", "you're projecting", "in before someone writes x"). Trite.
The foundation has paid the fee since 2003. By 2009, King's family had charged the Foundation $800,000 for the use of his words and image in fund-raising materials for the memorial.
Your deflection is noted, as is the lack of defense of the principle that drives this thread. Apparently you'd rather defend China's political system than take a stand against the very decline of your own country.
How was I defending China's political system? (I think you might have meant economic system because communism is an economic philosophy, nevertheless...) I merely pointed out that China does not have a communist economy as it practiced in the 1950s and 1960s. How's that a defense of China's political system?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.