Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,589,524 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by reid_g View Post
Just what we needed the federal gvt growing more with 20 new offices,yep we have lots of money
And they will all be filled with women and minorities if that provision is strickly upheld !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:46 AM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,144,567 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And they will all be filled with women and minorities if that provision is strickly upheld !
You might want to clarify that or liberals will take that as "we dont want women and minorities to work". lol

This quota bs is against the law. How they get away with this is beyond me. Jobs should NOT be given to someone based on their gender or skin color. And the Democrats tell us WE ARE THE RACISTS?! EVERYTHING they do has something to do with friggin race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:47 AM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,738,081 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
It's a better guarantee that the taxpayers won't have to pay for another bailout than what was in place before it.
The solution to the bailouts was to say 'No more bailouts.' Instead the Dems used a crisis largely created by government distortion of real estate and banking to increase the power of government at the expense of consumers. This monstrosity of a bill will add tens of billions of dollars to the cost of doing business and those costs will be passed on to the consumer. So we end up paying whether as taxpayers or consumers. So the bankers were made whole; the politicians increased their power; and the victims of all the chicanery get to pay the cost of the "reform." Don't you love it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:49 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,134,618 times
Reputation: 8527
[quote=Wapasha;15064580]Refusing to regulate Fannie and Freddy helped cause the financial melt down, and there is still no regulation for Fannie and Freddie in this bill. Refusing to perform monthly inspections on that oil well happened even with regulations demanding the inspections be performed.

When they relaxed the federal regulations on Banks selling high risk investments, they paved the way for the mess that caused the banks to collapse. They sold sub-prime mortgages as AAA securities because they could. Then when it all blew up in their faces, they were bailed out by the gubmt (remember TARP) on the taxpayers dime.

Last edited by CaseyB; 07-16-2010 at 10:38 AM.. Reason: the thread isn't about the oil spill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:53 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,590,814 times
Reputation: 2606
Default Yay! Feds Get More Power & Responsibility w/ Financ. Reg.

Yay!

Better than giving it to the corporations that sank the economy. We didn't stand the risk of a second depression until the Repubs repealed the Glass-Steagall Act in 2000, deregulating the financial system. Only took 8 uears for Wall St to mess it up big-time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 08:55 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,196,228 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Yay!

Better than giving it to the corporations that sank the economy. We didn't stand the risk of a second depression until the Repubs repealed the Glass-Steagall Act in 2000, deregulating the financial system. Only took 8 uears for Wall St to mess it up big-time.
Glass Steagal Act was repealed by Clinton.. And the money GOES TO corporations.. Do you understand that if one of these corporations go bad, TAXPAYERS take them over under this bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,830 posts, read 19,521,031 times
Reputation: 9625
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
Yay!

Better than giving it to the corporations that sank the economy. We didn't stand the risk of a second depression until the Repubs repealed the Glass-Steagall Act in 2000, deregulating the financial system. Only took 8 uears for Wall St to mess it up big-time.
it wasnt glass-steagall...it was clinton and fannie/freddie and the chiefs of HUD (cisneros, and andrew Cuomo) easing the rules on mortgages...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,589,524 times
Reputation: 27720
You didn't need 2000+ pages to say "NO" to bank bailouts. There's no rule requiring the government to bail them out in the first place.

If you recall the House said "NO" to TARP the first time. Then they got a closed door visit from Paulsen and Bernake and passed it the second time. Congress got strong armed by the bankers to pass a bill containing a "blank check" to the banks.

Boy have some been taken to the cleaners with this bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 09:03 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,134,618 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
it wasnt glass-steagall...it was clinton and fannie/freddie and the chiefs of HUD (cisneros, and andrew Cuomo) easing the rules on mortgages...

Look up Gram Leach Bliley, that was the bill that repealed Glass-Stengal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,589,524 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
it wasnt glass-steagall...it was clinton and fannie/freddie and the chiefs of HUD (cisneros, and andrew Cuomo) easing the rules on mortgages...
If Glass-Steagall was in place those bad mortgages wouldn't have had the same effect on Wall Street that they did. The bad mortgages would not have rippled throughout the entire financial economy.

We've had RE busts before and they were pretty much contained to the RE industry with just small amounts of fallout in related areas.

But this RE bust was the big Kahoona that took down Lehman and Bear and made GS and JPM billions richer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top