Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2010, 02:48 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,614,054 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

Bill O'Reilly's latest target is ... Jennifer Aniston.

The talk show host called comments from Aniston on single motherhood "destructive to society," according to PopEater.

Bill O'Reilly attacks ... Jennifer Aniston?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:38 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,949,243 times
Reputation: 12828
An accurate thread title would have stated: O'Reilly attacks the glamorization of single motherhood as destructive to society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,443,092 times
Reputation: 8564
Well at least he picked a real, live person to denigrate instead of a sitcom character.

Dan Quayle vs. Murphy Brown - TIME
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:45 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
An accurate thread title would have stated: O'Reilly attacks the glamorization of single motherhood as destructive to society.
well said. anniston is just the spokesperson for the movement, just like when dan quayle excoriated the show murphy brown for the same thing. we really need to support the nuclear family where there are two parents, one mother, one father, to raise children properly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,920,902 times
Reputation: 1701
single mothers, homosexual marriage, the schools, TV, OMG we're ruining society!!!
why can't we just go back to the days where women stayed in abusive relationships and put makup on their bruises, and homosexuals stayed in the closet and married, the schools followed church teachings, tv was leave it to beaver, and everything improper was swept under the rug as if it didn't exist?? LETS have those days again...

you can't legislate morality.. but you can talk sh*t about people and what they do.. unfortunately today nobody cares what your self righteous opinion is anymore...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
If a single woman has enough income to spend the time required to raise a child I have no objection. I do not see how this is "destructive to society" unless you mean it is destructive to a male dominated marriage where the woman has to raise two childern ie. her baby and her husband.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,434,359 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
well said. anniston is just the spokesperson for the movement, just like when dan quayle excoriated the show murphy brown for the same thing. we really need to support the nuclear family where there are two parents, one mother, one father, to raise children properly.
Yeah, it's much better to have some redneck couple slap their kid around, while forcing the child to believe in religious fairy tales..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:54 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,949,243 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
If a single woman has enough income to spend the time required to raise a child I have no objection. I do not see how this is "destructive to society" unless you mean it is destructive to a male dominated marriage where the woman has to raise two childern ie. her baby and her husband.
Some men are such babies now that they don't even stick around to support the offspring of their seed once they spread it. Instead they push women to abort the babies so that they do not have to pay child support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:55 AM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,929,680 times
Reputation: 1111
47% of single female pregnancies in the US are by minority teens.
How about we CAP the weenies of their thug boyfriends AND TRADE the girlz bling for some education on self respect?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2010, 09:03 AM
 
4,627 posts, read 10,475,181 times
Reputation: 4265
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerifree View Post
47% of single female pregnancies in the US are by minority teens.
How about we CAP the weenies of their thug boyfriends AND TRADE the girlz bling for some education on self respect?
Where'd you get that info? Plus, I doubt there is such a thing as single male pregnancies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top