Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:20 PM
 
301 posts, read 403,531 times
Reputation: 133

Advertisements

We've spent billions on fighting a country that we thought had WMDs. Well, there weren't any. Does that sound fiscally responsible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca
2,039 posts, read 3,278,844 times
Reputation: 1661
Are you honestly asking, or is this just another "tea partiers are racists cause they just don't like Obama" thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:28 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,920,640 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
We've spent billions on fighting a country that we thought had WMDs. Well, there weren't any. Does that sound fiscally responsible?
You really have no timeline conception do you. The Tea Party had not yet been born.


YouTube - CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

^^^This is the birth of the modern Tea Party
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:36 PM
 
301 posts, read 403,531 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecvMatt View Post
Are you honestly asking, or is this just another "tea partiers are racists cause they just don't like Obama" thread?
Seems like you're trying to make it be about that, because I neither mentioned Obama nor racism nor race at all. I'm talking about real fiscal issues here. Please don't play try and play the victim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:37 PM
 
301 posts, read 403,531 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
You really have no timeline conception do you. The Tea Party had not yet been born.


YouTube - CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

^^^This is the birth of the modern Tea Party
Thats what I'm saying, where was this movement for fiscal responsibility during
Bush years? The Iraq war was neither necessary nor fiscally responsible, but people seemed okay with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,287,058 times
Reputation: 2134
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecvMatt View Post
Are you honestly asking, or is this just another "tea partiers are racists cause they just don't like Obama" thread?
Jeez.. it's like all you tea partiers can do is race bait!

She didn't even mention race!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:47 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,843,013 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBeautyGoodness View Post
We've spent billions on fighting a country that we thought had WMDs. Well, there weren't any. Does that sound fiscally responsible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:48 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,117,473 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
You really have no timeline conception do you. The Tea Party had not yet been born.


YouTube - CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

^^^This is the birth of the modern Tea Party
Why wasn't it? Sounds like it would have been the perfect opportunity and reason to complain and rally against wasteful spending.

I'll tell you why..they are either too stupid to realize who and what is funding them or have such a rabid hatred of the POTUS that it does not matter.

The Tea Party movement began as an authentic grassroots uprising, the result of real, on-the-ground resentment against the government (for the bank bailout), the new African-American president and the falling fortunes of middle- and working-class white people in the devastated economy. Corporate-funded astroturf groups such as FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity and the Club for Growth saw in this burgeoning resentment the means to undermine progressives and to pave the way for enacting an anti-regulatory agenda that could spell billions in new profits for corporations and the financial industry at the expense of everyday people. And so they got busy, initially organizing the discontented in opposition to the health care reform legislation passed earlier this year.
http://www.truth-out.org/the-tea-par...ht-wing-politi

These dumb and blind fools are being manipulated by the very entities that they were against in the first place. They are feeeding the beast that they originally sought to kill.

Last edited by sickofnyc; 09-02-2010 at 03:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:49 PM
 
1,041 posts, read 1,524,961 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
You really have no timeline conception do you. The Tea Party had not yet been born.
It's fairly obvious he meant where was the uproar when billions were spent into a useless war. Not to mention wasted american lives and countless iraqi civilians, the destruction of Iraq and huge blow to american credibility abroad.

Don't be obtuse on purpose. It's a legitimate question. Why wasn't there any opposition back then to this wasteful and immoral spending but there is now, for social programs? Where was the uproar when Bush spent billions into record deficits? Remember that Obama's budget deficits include military spendings, which Bush/Cheney made sure to carefully leave out of the budget as a 'parallel spending'.

If anything, the fact that the Tea Party, or a similar movement, didn't exist during the Bush years...an era of wasteful spending and infringment of rights (patriot act I/II, torture, wars, etc...)...only shows that it's a partisan movement fueled by partisan media whose only interest is not "freedom" and "saving the economy" but rather taking down Democrats who won the last election.

Basically it's just plain old politics. The Tea Party is nothing new. It's just an attack dog for the Republicans and it works wonders because Republicans aren't looking like partisan hacks if they were the ones throwing the mud, but since the Tea Party has no real constituency, the gains are really for the Republicans.

Even a five year old would see through this silliness but people get easily carried away and become emotional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2010, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
12,200 posts, read 18,370,760 times
Reputation: 6655
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecvMatt View Post
Are you honestly asking, or is this just another "tea partiers are racists cause they just don't like Obama" thread?
Wait a minute I thought only liberals brought up race?

Oh I get it...you played a preemptive race card that way if it was played later in the game you could cut it Good move
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top