Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:47 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,119,058 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

Where's the story because it is absolutely clear that both the Michigan's Fair Housing Act of 1968 and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 specifically excludes anyone renting a room or an apartment in they themselves reside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:48 PM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,103,931 times
Reputation: 2863
The reasons to fight against the rot of liberalism and political correctness keep piling up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:53 PM
 
13,680 posts, read 20,822,556 times
Reputation: 7673
Quote:
What do you guys think?
I think if the women is a Bible thumper then she probably wants the same as a roomate. And let's face it, anyone other than another thumper is going to be impractical for both.

But if she is some who is trying to eliminate Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, or other non-Christian just because she does not want them, then I would say we are indeed talking about a violation.

Send an African-American Bible thumper and see what happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:54 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,550,665 times
Reputation: 7472
So are those sites who match people like match.com or others suppose to just say looking for a mate? No qualifications? That would be silly and no one would use them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,166 posts, read 22,262,606 times
Reputation: 13915
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
This woman is in no way violating the law. Yes, section 201 which you quoted says:

564.201 Unfair housing practices. [M.S.A. 26.1300(201)]
Sec. 201. It is an unfair housing practice for an owner, a real estate broker or real estate
salesman, or any other person as defined in this act:
(b) To refuse to engage in a real estate transaction with a person because of race, color, religion
or national origin.
(f) To publish or advertise, directly or indirectly, an intent to make a limitation, specification or
discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin.

However, the next section of the law (which you didn't link to but should have) says:

564.301 Exclusions. [M.S.A. 26.1300(301)]
Sec. 301. Section 201 does not apply:
(a) To the rental of a housing accommodation in a building which contains housing
accommodations for not more than 2 families living independently of each other, if the owner or
lessor or a member of his family resides in 1 of the housing accommodations.
(b) To the rental of a room or rooms in a single family dwelling by the owner or lessor if he or a
member of his family resides therein.

I bolded and underlined the relevant language. It seems clear to me section 201 of the law does not apply in this case. The state seems to be misapplying it.
I would think she should be excluded from who she chooses to be roommates with, but does this exclude her from the rules for advertising?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:56 PM
 
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
3,857 posts, read 6,968,775 times
Reputation: 1817
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Where's the story because it is absolutely clear that both the Michigan's Fair Housing Act of 1968 and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 specifically excludes anyone renting a room or an apartment in they themselves reside.
I believe that the state must investigate formal housing discrimination complaints. A private fair housing group complained and the state must follow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,636,755 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
I would think she should be excluded from who she chooses to be roommates with, but does this exclude her from the rules for advertising?
Do they apply to a private person putting a flyer on the Church bulletin board ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:58 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,411,790 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
So are those sites who match people like match.com or others suppose to just say looking for a mate? No qualifications? That would be silly and no one would use them.
I do not believe match.com is involved in real estate transactions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,636,755 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post
I believe that the state must investigate formal housing discrimination complaints. A private fair housing group complained and the state must follow up.
What is this country coming to when individuals are not allowed to pick and choose who they want living in their home with them ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,808 posts, read 41,097,858 times
Reputation: 62220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
this section:

[i]Chapter 2[indent][b](f) To publish or advertise, directly or indirectly, an intent to make a limitation, specification or discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin. What do you guys think?
Does this mean web dating services/bulletin boards/classifieds can't state preferences either?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top