Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is clear that democrats didn't want a woman in office. Democrats are anti-woman. She was clearly the better candidate and should ahve run away with the nomination.
Only reason she didn't is because the left is anti-woman.
You certainly don't understand liberals very well if you can say that Democrats don't want a woman in office. Liberals just recognized that Hillard came with too much baggage to win in the general election---namely Bill and how the Republicans would have used his scandals against Hillary and it became clear we had another viable candidate running who could and did win.
The strength they have is the money being thrown at them by the Neocons and corporate interest groups that are doing so in open secrecy. This is a major threat to our democracy and this pleases you?
1. We don't have a democracy. We are a Representative Republic.
2.Neocons? Again? That is your pat answere for everything. You don't even have a clue what the term means. But it's always the "neocons" huh?
So when IS a party a party? When it's called a party?
Does the party of the first part party with the party of the tea party?
Well, "Who?Me?", there is no national organizaton, there isn't a "leader" as Michael Steel for the Republicans. There is no "Party". Period. It is people. Period. You cannnot see a "Tea Party" on any ballot.
a hijacked party... go figure... hope they don't go after the green party.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.