Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, you don't think it was true that Communists, Socialists, Progressives, Liberals, Democrats and union members were standing side by side supporting the Progressive agend coming out of the WH at the One Nation rally? Are you also oblivious to the fact that the CPUSA had publicly came out in support of Obama and his policies? Are you also not aware of the fact that Obama's own website links back to the CPUSA and Socialist Party USA and vice-versa? Are you now going to tell me that none of that matters and doesn't mean anything?
You are asking me to draw a single concusion based on these individual facts. O.K. I will play.
First things first. I think that the Communists, Progressives, Socialists, and liberals want more socialistic policies coming out of the white house than they are getting. You forgot one of the big components of the One Nation Rally and that was NAACP and the Urban league. Why did you forget it? Because that fact does not tie in with the Beck Conclusion that it was a communist rally.
My conclusion is that there were a lot of people that came out in support of the Democrats. These people were made up of mostly democrats who include union workers, religous leaders, NAACP, urban league, liberals, people who just don't like the tea party and a very small amount of people who define themselves as Communist.
The fact that a former KKK grand wizard ran as a Republican and was elected as a republican does not make the republican party hijacked by the KKK.
Unfortunately, we are in a two party system. Each party has a broad base of political beliefs.
The conclusion that this was a Communist Rally is simply not supported by the facts. To believe that it was would simply require that you simply ignore all the rest of the facts.
You are asking me to draw a single concusion based on these individual facts. O.K. I will play.
First things first. I think that the Communists, Progressives, Socialists, and liberals want more socialistic policies coming out of the white house than they are getting. You forgot one of the big components of the One Nation Rally and that was NAACP and the Urban league. Why did you forget it? Because that fact does not tie in with the Beck Conclusion that it was a communist rally.
My conclusion is that there were a lot of people that came out in support of the Democrats. These people were made up of mostly democrats who include union workers, religous leaders, NAACP, urban league, liberals, people who just don't like the tea party and a very small amount of people who define themselves as Communist.
The fact that a former KKK grand wizard ran as a Republican and was elected as a republican does not make the republican party hijacked by the KKK.
Unfortunately, we are in a two party system. Each party has a broad base of political beliefs.
The conclusion that this was a Communist Rally is simply not supported by the facts. To believe that it was would simply require that you simply ignore all the rest of the facts.
You just lost every last thread of credibility you had. You just will never see the truth. Have fun!
You just lost every last thread of credibility you had. You just will never see the truth. Have fun!
The truth as you and Beck see it? Come on, come back and play this is fune...it is easy, but it is still fun.
Also, here is Fox's coverage of the rally. It does not mention anything about communist. In addition to the Democratic party, they must have hijacked Fox News too. Darn commies.
The truth as you and Beck see it? Come on, come back and play this is fune...it is easy, but it is still fun.
Also, here is Fox's coverage of the rally. It does not mention anything about communist. In addition to the Democratic party, they must have hijacked Fox News too. Darn commies.
Yeah real fun trying to talk to someone who has absolutely no clue about the topic at hand. You are so far behind the news cycle it isn't even funny. You don't even know about things that happened months ago. Typical for the Left, you guys never know anything about the people you support or bash, you just listen to what the Huffington Post or Media Matters tells you to think.
Yeah real fun trying to talk to someone who has absolutely no clue about the topic at hand. You are so far behind the news cycle it isn't even funny. You don't even know about things that happened months ago. Typical for the Left, you guys never know anything about the people you support or bash, you just listen to what the Huffington Post or Media Matters tells you to think.
Dude I gave you a Fox article? Enlighten me on how right Beck is, please. Today he virtually called Soros the anti-Christ. Hey, he could be, one never knows about these things...assuming you believe in the anti-christ. I don't know if Mormons believe that way or not.
I just want to know who are the communist democrats in Congress. There may be one. I need to know who they are so I will not vote for them. Has Beck uncovered that in his investigative reporting?
We progressive patriots are afraid of the darkness of ignorance that hides the light. There have always been "Glenn Becks" who gain power and wealth by appealing to people's worse nature and ignorant fears. When will we ever learn?
I hope you will finally get yourselves out "of the darkness of ignorance" and start paying attention to "documented" and "proven trails of facts" that Glenn often brings forth. There is nothing he brings to his program for which he has not the proof which he shares of that of which he speaks.
There is so much out-and-out ignorance spouted here by "progressives," etc., that I cannot help but reiterate my wonder (as I have stated elsewhere on other threads here) that such statements as above are simply "plants" by scared groups in power that are afraid their agenda is being exposed so "plants" are sent to try to obscure/cloud the truth within the "sane" part of the discussion. People living in this day and age of communication simply can't be that ignorant...can they?
I hope you will finally get yourselves out "of the darkness of ignorance" and start paying attention to "documented" and "proven trails of facts" that Glenn often brings forth. There is nothing he brings to his program for which he has not the proof which he shares of that of which he speaks.
There is so much out-and-out ignorance spouted here by "progressives," etc., that I cannot help but reiterate my wonder (as I have stated elsewhere on other threads here) that such statements as above are simply "plants" by scared groups in power that are afraid their agenda is being exposed so "plants" are sent to try to obscure/cloud the truth within the "sane" part of the discussion. People living in this day and age of communication simply can't be that ignorant...can they?
I hope you will finally get yourselves out "of the darkness of ignorance" and start paying attention to "documented" and "proven trails of facts" that Glenn often brings forth. There is nothing he brings to his program for which he has not the proof which he shares of that of which he speaks.
There is so much out-and-out ignorance spouted here by "progressives," etc., that I cannot help but reiterate my wonder (as I have stated elsewhere on other threads here) that such statements as above are simply "plants" by scared groups in power that are afraid their agenda is being exposed so "plants" are sent to try to obscure/cloud the truth within the "sane" part of the discussion. People living in this day and age of communication simply can't be that ignorant...can they?
So anyone who disagrees with Beck must be a plant? Of course you could not disagree with him unless of course you were a plant. What you Beckites don't seem to understand is that Beck does use facts, but not all of them to support his conclusion of which there are certainly many different ones. Just because the facts are true it does not mean that the conclusion is true.
Please give me an example of a conclusion where he has used a proven trail of facts. Everything is not a Communist Conspiracy.
Dude I gave you a Fox article? Enlighten me on how right Beck is, please. Today he virtually called Soros the anti-Christ. Hey, he could be, one never knows about these things...assuming you believe in the anti-christ. I don't know if Mormons believe that way or not.
I just want to know who are the communist democrats in Congress. There may be one. I need to know who they are so I will not vote for them. Has Beck uncovered that in his investigative reporting?
You are only looking on the surface at this. You can't see them there, they hide behind the scenes. The Communists are all the players behind the scenes within Obama's Czars. The radical groups behind all of the policies are Progressive/Communist organizations.
Why do you think the Dem Congress doesn't read bills? They didn't write them and they are voting on bills that were written up behind the scenes within those radical groups.
If you did just an ounce of research and look at the planks of the CPUSA, you will see a direct coorelation with what rhetoric you here coming from the Progressives in DC. They share the EXACT same agenda. You think that's a coincidence? It's far from a coincidence, it's a conspiracy.
So anyone who disagrees with Beck must be a plant? Of course you could not disagree with him unless of course you were a plant. What you Beckites don't seem to understand is that Beck does use facts, but not all of them to support his conclusion of which there are certainly many different ones. Just because the facts are true it does not mean that the conclusion is true.
Please give me an example of a conclusion where he has used a proven trail of facts. Everything is not a Communist Conspiracy.
Why do I even bother?
1. He said that the Progressives will come out and try to convince people that HC is a Constitutional right. Did they not do this?
2. He said that the FED would soon be monitizing our debt. Are they not doing this?
3. He said that all the Communist and Socialist groups would finally come out and show their partnership with the Progressives in DC when things got tough. They did that too right?
4. He knew that the Left would call him an anti-semite for showing people who Soros really was. Didn't that happen?
There are a ton more, chew on those for a while, then go do some homework.
BTW,
when he says Soros is the antichrist, he doesn't mean it literally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
