A Question about Libertarians. (independence, states, propaganda, vote)

[henrjam]

Is there any difference between their ideal world and the way the society was constructed and established in the mid-nineteenth century.

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by henrjam

Is there any difference between their ideal world and the way the society was constructed and established in the mid-nineteenth century.

If you can disregard the spin doctors and propaganda ministry, and take the words at face value, it's clearly far different.

Based on the Declaration of Independence, we know:
Job #1 = secure rights, and
Job #2 = govern those who consent.

Those who didn't give consent, retained their sovereignty - also known as natural and personal liberty.

Those who did consent, surrendered their inalienable rights.
(See "militia duty", from 1777 onward)

If you read the Declaration, the Articles of Confederation, and then the USCON, you may infer that "The People of the United States" were not the people of the United States of America.

We know this because not all people could vote, and thus consent to the terms of the compact (USCON). And without consent, they were not "governed", nor did they surrender their sovereign prerogatives.

More details:
//www.city-data.com/forum/16476988-post19.html