Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2010, 01:01 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,105,768 times
Reputation: 4828

Advertisements

Joe Rehyansky, a Judge in Tennessee and Vietnam war vet, recently wrote an article published on the conservative news outlet "The Daily Caller" about gays in the military. In the article he claims gay men shouldn't be allowed to serve because men (especially gay men) are too promiscuous. He describe male sexuality by saying “it fell to men to swing through the trees and scour the caves in search of as many women as possible to subdue and impregnate – a tough job but someone had to do it".

As to gay men, he feels that "most men who are sexually attracted to other men can and do indulge their promiscuous urges with little or no restraint; i.e., it’s “party time” all the time" and therefore argues "shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view? They are, after all, guys."


He then says lesbians (and women in general) are not highly sexual and should therefore be allowed to serve in the military. He compares gay men to lesbians by saying "...most gays are not inclined toward military service, but many lesbians are, and it is an open secret that they do well in the calling, especially in medical and administrative specialties."

Then comes the added bonus: "My solution (letting lesbians serve) would get the distaff (female) part of our homosexual population off our collective ‘Broke Back,’ thus giving straight male GIs a fair shot at converting lesbians and bringing them into the mainstream.”


I think this is a great idea . It keeps those sex-obsessed, would be gay male rapists away from our straight male soldiers while allowing those same straight male soldiers the opportunity to convert lesbians to heterosexuality. It's a win-win.


Daily Caller: Draft lesbians, then turn them straight - Amanda Hess | TBD.com


Judge: Let lesbians into military so male GIs can turn them straight | Raw Story

Don’t hint, don’t wink: An immodest proposal | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2010, 01:12 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
LMAO..Conservatives, i tell ya!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 01:26 PM
 
46,964 posts, read 26,005,972 times
Reputation: 29454
Default Somebody's in the closet...

Apparently the good judge's thoughts of the military begins and ends with "lascivious enjoyment" of those "lithe, naked bodies" in the shower. Iiiiiiiinteresting choice of words there, your honor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,227,263 times
Reputation: 6553
LOL its like a bad joke. Its like something from My cousin Vinney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,325,718 times
Reputation: 7026
This guy's nuttier than Rocky the Squirrel's stool sample.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 02:37 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,105,768 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
This guy's nuttier than Rocky the Squirrel's stool sample.
He's typical of most social conservatives when it comes to gays - he perpetuates ridiculous stereotypes. My favorite quote of his from the article is this:

"The associations and lifestyles of gays encourage these opposing natural forces. Lesbians do not face the same pressures as straight women to “put out” for men. They therefore tend to develop long-term, monogamous, stable, and even permanent relationships. Certainly they have their counterparts among gays, but they are rarer than hyperactive sloths."

A gay man in (or wanting) a stable relationship is rarer than a hyperactive sloth - please. It'd be funny if so many idiots didn't buy into such crap and use it as a reason to hate and discriminate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 02:59 PM
 
3,562 posts, read 5,228,739 times
Reputation: 1861
If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.

I am toying with using the gay porn on the internet rational for damn near everything in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
3,849 posts, read 3,753,645 times
Reputation: 1706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandamonium View Post
If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.

I am toying with using the gay porn on the internet rational for damn near everything in the future.
For something that - according to the judge - 'saturates the internet', I've seen damn little of it in my 12 years of internet cruising. Also wondering if he thinks there's more gay porn than straight. It wouldn't surprise me to find that there's more child porn than the other two combined. Of course he and others like him would find some way to blame that on the gays as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,485,034 times
Reputation: 4185
By Tennessee standards this guy seems rather progressive!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2010, 04:26 PM
 
3,562 posts, read 5,228,739 times
Reputation: 1861
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsMcQ LV View Post
For something that - according to the judge - 'saturates the internet', I've seen damn little of it in my 12 years of internet cruising. Also wondering if he thinks there's more gay porn than straight. It wouldn't surprise me to find that there's more child porn than the other two combined. Of course he and others like him would find some way to blame that on the gays as well.
He shouldn't type gay + porn and hit search. If he stopped then the internet wouldn't be saturated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top