Teapartier That Assaulted Young Girl Has Day In Court (Glenn Beck, state, amendment)

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by Sco

I can't find anything in my copy of the Bill of Rights that says constitutional protections can be revoked if you alter your appearance or carry a sign without approved content. You must have a special tea party version.

There is no constitutional protection. Not even the Supreme Court says you are entitlted to protection, even if the police are present.

Court Says No Protection Required

The flaw in your argument is that cant discuss revoking something that doesnt exist in the first place..

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by Langlen

I don't care if anyone's been charged with domestic terrorism, only convicted

And I never said he was guilty, only saying that her past doesn't excuse the assault against her, which is shown on the videotapes and unarguable.

Where was the assault?

What you saw and what I see if different.

I see him trying to hold her down and his foot slips.

You are correct, the videotape shows her charging the candidate with the intent to cause harm, unarguable right?

[TruthBTold2U]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

FACTS

She is a felon and has DOMESTIC TERRORIST charges on her record along with other arrest history.

So now you are defending a terrorist criminal?

Goodness.

* But it was ok for her to attack the candidate with a sign according to you?

Where is this arrest record? After I googled her record and after three pages of right wing web sites this is the only neutral site I could find.

We've learned Valle, who is from Massachusetts and recently graduated from Columbia University, was arrested in Louisiana for spray painting a message on a ship and refusing to leave the ship during the BP oil spill.


http://www.wave3.com/story/13407150/who-is-lauren-valle

Also I don't think she is a felon, yet, as that case has not been heard in court.

[meson]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

I'm still waiting for something other than your say so that she has a criminal record, but I'm having my doubts that she actually does.

Sunny never produces evidence.

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

I'm still waiting for something other than your say so that she has a criminal record, but I'm having my doubts that she actually does.

Google is your best friend.

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by meson

Sunny never produces evidence.

I am not on trial and do not have to produce to you anything.

I produce plenty of evidence over and over and of course you and others go away like little busy bees from the thread real quick.

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

Where was the assault?

What you saw and what I see if different.

I see him trying to hold her down and his foot slips.

You are correct, the videotape shows her charging the candidate with the intent to cause harm, unarguable right?

Trying to hold her down? Foot slips?....Yeah right

Do you need glasses?

[jillz]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

Google is your best friend.

Use it. You are claiming she not only was charged but convicted. YOU prove it.

[Sco]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

I'm still waiting for something other than your say so that she has a criminal record, but I'm having my doubts that she actually does.

I don't believe it either, not one shred of proof has been offered so far. And it really doesn't matter anyway, she could have been a convicted felon and it still doesn't give someone the right to stomp on her head for no reason.

It is astounding that some people think something like her politics or past actions actually matters when the video shows the guy stomping on her head while she is being held down.

[meson]

Originally Posted by jillz

Use it. You are claiming she not only was charged but convicted. YOU prove it.

She is puffing hot air, or maybe hot smoke, she can't prove it.