Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is nothing indecent about actress Charlotte Ross' rear end. That's the word from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York, which tossed a roughly $1.4 million fine that the Federal Communications Commission had slapped on ABC and some of its affilaites in 2008 for a 2003 episode of the police drama "NYPD Blue" in which Ross' buttocks were visible to viewers.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Shouldn't there be a poll choice for what a friggin' waste of the court's time? Of course, coming from an administration that had an AG who felt it necessary to drape nude statuary it's hardly surprising. Too bad they didn't find unnecessary wars of choice equally offensive.
Any society that considers nudity to be more objectionable than pictures of death and destruction (real or imagined) has a very strange set of priorities.
I would find full frontal nudity of men or women in movies or on TV unobjectionable compared to seeing somebody get his brains scattered over a wall on some cop show. The former is entertaining and the latter disgusting. Salacious action is better than murderous. This is difference between good and evil.
Any society that considers nudity to be more objectionable than pictures of death and destruction (real or imagined) has a very strange set of priorities.
Quite true.
Quote:
I would find full frontal nudity of men or women in movies or on TV unobjectionable compared to seeing somebody get his brains scattered over a wall on some cop show. The former is entertaining and the latter disgusting. Salacious action is better than murderous. This is difference between good and evil.
Strangely enough,growing up we had TV shows that regularly showed breasts and even had full frontal nudity,all on the 'regular' TV(well actually that is that existed at the time..LOL).
But violence such as commonly seen now didn't exist.
I've got a big problem with that scene. Where was the studly naked guy? I want something to look at, too!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
