Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This "fauxto" is particularly laughable. It has zero qualities of a real photo. It has the look of water color painting. The "plane" is an obvious fake, the "buildings" have ghost edges, the sky is a rainbow of lovely pastels.
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.
[b]
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force career.
.
this is how the twoofers count and get their 1400
1 Kwiatkowski
2 Kwiatkowski
and just who is Kwiatkowski, a person who is MAKING MONEY off of the twoofers... books and money...there you go folks the twoofer agenda..make money off the sheeple
Last edited by workingclasshero; 02-04-2011 at 12:59 PM..
What a crock of back peddling tap dancing BS that video is! We should believe this professional sounding reader/announcer- why?
AND OF COURSE he would say that we should focus on the "big picture" and not on isolated anomalies when, in fact, the isolated anomalies are what any investigator focuses on when analyzing a photo/video for authenticity as well as the focus on overall appearance.
It is interesting to see the rebuttals coming out re the faked vids of 9/11. Thanks for posting this one.
ghost edges....never heard of that term before.. but I have heard of the sunlight edging
btw are you trying to say the actual corner is 'ghosting'
You are using a different photo, why is that? I'm talking about the phony looking edges and below is a much better example which you can see both on the insert as well as the blow up on the left of the screen. The term "ghost edges" has come up in looking into this so I use the term, knowing no other, and because it pretty well describes the phenomenon.
" THE CBS 'FOLLOW-UP' SHOT
Only 1min & 52seconds after the "LIVE strike", CBS aired a "follow-up" shot. It showed a small dot passing between the Empire State Building. So small, in fact, that CBS anchor Bryant Gumbel complained that he couldn't see it.
This shot exemplifies most effectively the digital aspect of the 9/11 TV broadcasts. By simply blowing up a detail of the scenery, we can make the following observations : 1• No 'video artifact' issues can account for the thick, black linings/ghost edges (see contour of WTC). The "plane" is seen overlapping those edges.
2• The approach angle/trajectory of the "plane" is absurd: if this were to be a Boeing 767 (travelling at the reported speed of "550mph"!) no way could it perform a last-minute turn to hit the WTC almost head-on (as seen in other 9/11 imagery).
3• The overall aspect of the imagery is not in the least consistent with real, video broadcasting standards; it has an altogether artificial aspect often seen in chroma-key/luma-key filtering or similar digital manipulations."
just because your twoofer sight says things are phoney...doesnt mean they are
fact. 2 passenger planes crashed into the twin towers on the morning of 11 Sep 2001
fact the damage of the impact and the ensuing fires cause a global collapse of the towers. luckily yhr towers stood for a little while allowing most of the people within the towers to be saved.
all the video's and twoofers sight cant dismisss those two facts
You can have your relatively pristine plane parts OR you can have your MSM "live video" of a "plane" being essentially swallowed into a "building" INTACT, complete with 'plane shaped hole' including wings- with NO parts seen flying off. You cannot have both, so does this raise any questions in anybody's mind?
But let me assure you .... neither you nor anyone else here have a leg to stand on credibility wise, when you make such absurd insinuations that all issues and questions have been adequately addressed by these OBVIOUS fake videos ... obvious lies ... constantly changing stories .... and incalculable list of inconsistencies.
And I can also assure you that I couldn't care less about personal insults hurled by shills and nitwits. Every time this occurs, what little credibility you have left takes another big hit.
So keep it up ... keep making the ridiculous claims that these videos of planes "melting" into steel structures are legitimate. Keep claiming that foreground fixed structures can move from one side of the landscape to the other side in two separate videos of the same relative action and angle. Keep claiming that backgrounds can move dramatically at the same time foregrounds remain stationary and fixed. Keep claiming that that aluminum airplanes can crash through steel and concrete structures, emerging out of the other side intact.
The more you do ... the more obvious your lack of credibility.
Your arguing tactics are kind of lame, dude, since I have never claimed the validity of any videos or any of the things you claim I am defending anywhere on these threads or anywhere else. As a matter of fact, THAT'S the friggin point--I didn't get my information from videos or websites at all. I have no idea what would prompt you to even type that.
And you can call me shill and nitwit and all the other names they teach you to hurl in Conspiracy Theory Specialist school when you don't really want to have a rational conversation. Have a party with that. The fact remains that I was inside the north tower on 9/11/2001, know a hell of a lot of people who were also inside and around the buildings that day, know a hell of a lot of people who worked on the pile and at Fresh Kills, worked in the WTC for 20 years, some of that time directly related to the building, and work on the current construction project.
You have truther website videos and recitations. I am not particularly concerned about people who feel that your credibility outweighs mine.
I tried and was unable to play the videos with either Widows Media or Real Player- don't know why and don't have a lot of time to figure it out right now. But maybe you will have better luck. Thanks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
