Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Here
2,301 posts, read 2,035,116 times
Reputation: 1712

Advertisements

After some deliberation, I've decided that I'm for a well-conceived Fat Tax. That's the tax that would be on unhealthy foods. If we're going to tax the crap out of cigarettes and achololic beverages, might as well go all-out and tax Pepsi, Big Macs and Baby Ruths. It would especially make sense if we had tax-paid health care. Use the Fat Tax to pay for the health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:02 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,362,970 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by GalileoSmith View Post
After some deliberation, I've decided that I'm for a well-conceived Fat Tax. That's the tax that would be on unhealthy foods. If we're going to tax the crap out of cigarettes and achololic beverages, might as well go all-out and tax Pepsi, Big Macs and Baby Ruths. It would especially make sense if we had tax-paid health care. Use the Fat Tax to pay for the health care.
LOL..You should see my entrance. We have cases of "junk" for the party tomorrow....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:11 PM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,767,203 times
Reputation: 3002
When you put it that way..... we do have extra taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, why not on junk as well?? I'd be willing to hear good arguments for and against and base my final opinion on those.

Any takers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:12 PM
 
7,956 posts, read 9,167,791 times
Reputation: 9384
I'm for "affordable" medical solutions to erase the epidemic of obesity. Instead of performing dangerous, and expensive bariatric surgery which further strains the healthcare system and is inherently unfair to those without insurance, we should just wire fat peoples' jaws shut

Best yet, we wouldn't have to hear them whine about how they really don't eat all that much anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,332,494 times
Reputation: 2889
I'm not a fan of sin taxes of any form as the money they garner rarely goes to the 'cause' they are meant to support. But, I would be open to debate if it could be guaranteed that the money would fund health related costs to our government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
20,294 posts, read 37,212,349 times
Reputation: 16397
Quote:
Originally Posted by GalileoSmith View Post
After some deliberation, I've decided that I'm for a well-conceived Fat Tax. That's the tax that would be on unhealthy foods. If we're going to tax the crap out of cigarettes and achololic beverages, might as well go all-out and tax Pepsi, Big Macs and Baby Ruths. It would especially make sense if we had tax-paid health care. Use the Fat Tax to pay for the health care.
How about a tax on all of these?

-Skinny tax
-Tall tax
-Short tax
-Ugly tax
-Illegal immigrant tax
-Legal immigrant tax
-A pet tax
-A TV tax (a TV tax like in the UK)
-A radio tax
-An Internet tax (for posting in this forum)
-A child tax
-A gay tax, a straight tax, a porno tax
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:24 PM
 
7,956 posts, read 9,167,791 times
Reputation: 9384
If we were truly interested in taxing the actions that wind up costing society more down the road there are a lot of other places to look in addition to cigarettes, alcohol and fatty foods.

How about taxing unwed mothers, divorced couples, deadbeat dads, hispanic and African American families? Percentage wise their children are incarcerated at a higher rate than children coming from white married families. Incarceration is very expensive and is a drain on the taxpayer too.

Then we could tax those whose heritage/genetics/weight puts them at a higher risk of getting a particular disease (or isn't that what we were trying to stop by eliminating preexisting conditions in Obamacare?

See, taxing every little thing that could wind up increasing a cost down the road gets a little silly when you figure all the possible things that fit that description.

Last edited by NSHL10; 02-05-2011 at 04:24 PM.. Reason: sp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:43 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,287,940 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by GalileoSmith View Post
After some deliberation, I've decided that I'm for a well-conceived Fat Tax. That's the tax that would be on unhealthy foods. If we're going to tax the crap out of cigarettes and achololic beverages, might as well go all-out and tax Pepsi, Big Macs and Baby Ruths. It would especially make sense if we had tax-paid health care. Use the Fat Tax to pay for the health care.
I think we should only tax the hell out of people proposing taxes on over taxed other people's wallet. Just saying!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:57 PM
 
Location: East Chicago, IN
3,100 posts, read 3,304,672 times
Reputation: 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSHL10 View Post
If we were truly interested in taxing the actions that wind up costing society more down the road there are a lot of other places to look in addition to cigarettes, alcohol and fatty foods.

How about taxing unwed mothers, divorced couples, deadbeat dads, hispanic and African American families? Percentage wise their children are incarcerated at a higher rate than children coming from white married families. Incarceration is very expensive and is a drain on the taxpayer too.

Then we could tax those whose heritage/genetics/weight puts them at a higher risk of getting a particular disease (or isn't that what we were trying to stop by eliminating preexisting conditions in Obamacare?

See, taxing every little thing that could wind up increasing a cost down the road gets a little silly when you figure all the possible things that fit that description.
If they're already impoverished, it's getting blood from a turnip, ain't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Striving for Avalon
1,431 posts, read 2,482,437 times
Reputation: 3451
Even better...

Eliminate subsidies to corn and allow it to compete in the open market with sugar. Remove all import quotas on sugar. There's a reason why high fructose corn syrup is so common and sugar is relatively rare...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top