Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2015, 06:59 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I wonder how many jobs these billionaires are responsible for?

??? You could argue that Paul Allen is responsible for thousands of sports-related jobs (e.g. his teams and venues). You could also argue that those jobs would exist without him since those teams and venues would still exist under someone else's ownership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:05 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,202 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
Congratulations teabaggers,

You've succeeded in helping to add 214 billionaires to that exclusive club. All you need to do now is to keep up the pressure on all of that working class scum.


The World's Billionaires - Forbes.com
Not that I think another 214 billionaires is a bad thing but what do you think the Tea Party did to help make this possible? Was it quantitative easing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:07 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeyore1954 View Post
Not that I think another 214 billionaires is a bad thing but what do you think the Tea Party did to help make this possible? Was it quantitative easing?

The wealthy got quantitative easing. The poor got qualitative reaming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:08 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,202 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
??? You could argue that Paul Allen is responsible for thousands of sports-related jobs (e.g. his teams and venues). You could also argue that those jobs would exist without him since those teams and venues would still exist under someone else's ownership.
Microsoft employs close to 130,000 people and while I do not have the numbers in front of me I would bet most are good jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:09 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,587,085 times
Reputation: 2823
I'm supposed to be upset because 214 people accumulated wealth? I'm more upset about the many people that think they shouldn't care about school or how they behave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:11 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,291 posts, read 1,524,025 times
Reputation: 747
I'm more upset about the fact that middle class wealth isn't growing like wealthy wealth is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:18 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,202 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeyore1954 View Post
Microsoft employs close to 130,000 people and while I do not have the numbers in front of me I would bet most are good jobs.
I see this is an old thread. Since this thread started Microsoft added 30,000 jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,224,629 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
Congratulations teabaggers,

You've succeeded in helping to add 214 billionaires to that exclusive club. All you need to do now is to keep up the pressure on all of that working class scum.


The World's Billionaires - Forbes.com
I sure sign of tea party derangement syndrome to connect the two
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 07:26 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,060,202 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeyore1954 View Post
Not that I think another 214 billionaires is a bad thing but what do you think the Tea Party did to help make this possible? Was it quantitative easing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
The wealthy got quantitative easing. The poor got qualitative reaming.
When I posted that I thought this was a recent thread and my point was a lot of upper class wealth has been caused by QE and the stock markets response. This certainly was not because of the Tea Party.

I am trying to remember how much the market had gone from 2008 to 2011.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2015, 08:22 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,621,539 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
Congratulations teabaggers,

You've succeeded in helping to add 214 billionaires to that exclusive club. All you need to do now is to keep up the pressure on all of that working class scum.


The World's Billionaires - Forbes.com



And this hurts you how?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top