Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
On what grounds?
They violated the open meetings law.

Quote:
A Dane County judge Friday ordered a temporary halt to Gov. Scott Walker's controversial measure curbing collective bargaining for public employees, saying a legislative committee likely violated the state Open Meetings Law when it rushed passage of the bill earlier this month.
Judge orders temporary halt to collective bargaining law; state will appeal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You do realize that the state collective bargaining is not part of the budget bill right?
We sure do! It never was about the budget like Walker lied about initially.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelstress View Post
Now that the dems are back, why not just vote on the original bill?
It was stripped from the budget bill so that they could vote on it without the democrats present. Therefore, the original bill no longer contains the non-budget issue of collective bargaining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:20 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
We sure do! It never was about the budget like Walker lied about initially.
Tell it to the people that have to keep coming up with the money to pay escalating property taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:20 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
They didn't violate anything. The law has been posted already. The judge is wrong and this will get overturned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpNort View Post
During SPECIAL session, they can vote WITHOUT any notice. That is how OUR LAW in Wisconsin is written.
Only in an emergency. What was the emergency with passing the bill that strips public workers of collective bargaining?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Tell it to the people that have to keep coming up with the money to pay escalating property taxes.
Tell it to gov. Walker who admittedly stripped collective bargaining out of the budget bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,214,794 times
Reputation: 4258
Ozanne, a Democrat, the guy who asked for and received a temporary restraining order against the law was never elected to the position. He was selected as a replacement for the former DA who was elected to the state appellate court. Ozanne had two letters of recommendation, the next closest candidate had 77 letters of recommendation.

Some question if Ozanne is working in the best interest of the people or paying a public debt.

Links available at Google.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
They didn't violate anything. The law has been posted already. The judge is wrong and this will get overturned.
Wrong.

Here is the law;

Quote:
(3) Public notice of every meeting of a governmental body shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of such meeting unless for good cause such notice is impossible or impractical, in which case shorter notice may be given, but in no case may the notice be provided less than 2 hours in advance of the meeting.
Wisconsin Open Meetings Law
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:29 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Wrong.

Here is the law;


Wisconsin Open Meetings Law

They had plenty of notice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top