Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,347,675 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
It is funny watching the RW reactions when the President gets a conflict response correct. It's particularly embarrassing to them, that it is a Democratic President.

It's even funnier watching the LW hypocrits cheer as Obama has committed an impeachable offense by attacking another country without congressional approval.
Even funnier still is watching florid.bob try to delfect and avoid answering previous posts when he is clearly wrong.
What's not so funny is watching these same people cheer because the president has a (D) after his name as we fight for one side in a conflict when we don't even know who is on that side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Way,Way Up On The Old East Coast
2,196 posts, read 1,994,806 times
Reputation: 1089
Default When "Muppets" are put in charge !!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
At the behest of the USA.
The USA pushed for the UN resolution.

Glad to clear that up for you.
oz in SC !!! ... Precisely !

It appears that the "Towering Intellect" in the ole 'Yankee WH" was at it once again ! What ?

Ho & Crew ... The absolute "DreamTeam" ! Yep ... If there every was one this bunch is it !

Cheerio / Old Sgt. Lamar
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,347,675 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoro View Post
And Obama never once said that Libya was a threat to the US nor did he run a campaign trying to paint mental picture in the public mind of "a mushroom cloud over an American city."

He said up front that it was a mission to prevent Qadaffi from slaughtering civilians in eastern Libya, as Qadaffi stated was his intent. The UN security council acted. The US responded to the UN request and NATO allies have now taken over the bulk of the heavy lifting.

You seem to be eager to see China taking the lead in world affairs. Why do you hate America?
The U.S. was never obligated to do anything and Obama acted illegally without congressional approval. That wasn't even anywhere close to a good attempt at deflection. What else have you got?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,443,995 times
Reputation: 4070
Lightbulb What nations took over the US role in Iraq? Oh, we're still there 8 years later...

This just in:

NATO considers expanded role in Libya


As NATO prepares to take over responsibility for the no-fly zone in Libya, the 28-member alliance on Sunday was also debating a separate plan to expand military actions in the country at war.
NATO's military committee approved an operations plan early Sunday that would shift the entire Libyan mission to alliance command, including rules of engagement. This technical approval now requires unanimous political consent from all members before NATO officially takes the operation over.
As NATO ambassadors prepared to meet Sunday evening in Brussels to discuss the plan, NATO sources said it was not a done deal and divisions remained about if and when to engage in airstrikes against Libyan ground forces.
At the same time, NATO was putting the final touches on its takeover of the no-fly zone over Libya. The handover from the United States and allies should be complete by Monday. NATO officials described the transition as phased and seamless operation.

Full article here:

NATO considers expanded role in Libya - CNN.com

So many right wingers are oh so eager to try to paint Obama with the incompetency brush that Dubya slapped himself with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:42 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,443,995 times
Reputation: 4070
Talking Alert the authorities

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
The U.S. was never obligated to do anything and Obama acted illegally without congressional approval. That wasn't even anywhere close to a good attempt at deflection. What else have you got?

Call the sheriff.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.[citation needed] The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution


Where do you get your "information?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:53 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
The U.S. was never obligated to do anything and Obama acted illegally without congressional approval. That wasn't even anywhere close to a good attempt at deflection. What else have you got?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoro View Post
Call the sheriff.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.[citation needed] The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

War Powers Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Where do you get your "information?"
Your quote actually confirms the statement made by Rick to be true.. here, let me requote and bold the relevant part..

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C.1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.

Where is the authorization of Congress? Is the US under attack or serious threat from Libya?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,347,675 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoro View Post
Call the sheriff.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.[citation needed] The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

War Powers Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Where do you get your "information?"
I suggest that you read your own post carefully there, champ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,347,675 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoro View Post
This just in:

NATO considers expanded role in Libya


As NATO prepares to take over responsibility for the no-fly zone in Libya, the 28-member alliance on Sunday was also debating a separate plan to expand military actions in the country at war.
NATO's military committee approved an operations plan early Sunday that would shift the entire Libyan mission to alliance command, including rules of engagement. This technical approval now requires unanimous political consent from all members before NATO officially takes the operation over.
As NATO ambassadors prepared to meet Sunday evening in Brussels to discuss the plan, NATO sources said it was not a done deal and divisions remained about if and when to engage in airstrikes against Libyan ground forces.
At the same time, NATO was putting the final touches on its takeover of the no-fly zone over Libya. The handover from the United States and allies should be complete by Monday. NATO officials described the transition as phased and seamless operation.

Full article here:

NATO considers expanded role in Libya - CNN.com

So many right wingers are oh so eager to try to paint Obama with the incompetency brush that Dubya slapped himself with.

Germany is a member of NATO. How many of their forces will be involved?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:57 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,443,995 times
Reputation: 4070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Germany is a member of NATO. How many of their forces will be involved?

How many would you like?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:58 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,443,995 times
Reputation: 4070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
I suggest that you read your own post carefully there, champ.

You can breathe easier until the 60 days are up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top