Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:13 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20884

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Can someone please explain this to me?



Summary:

During the Obamacare debate, the GOP complained that Obamacare would hurt seniors by cutting Medicare by $500 billion. Then they unanimously vote to eliminate medicare and replace it with vouches that does not guarantee benefits like medicare does. In which every single independent analysis states that seniors will be paying more out of pocket expenses.

With the deflections, someone please explain this to me.

We have been through this with you before, but apparently you did not understand.

When Obama cut Medicare by $500 billion, he did so to finance Obamacare. Without this "cut" (which was never going to happen), as well as other fraudulent accounting measures, Obamacare would be "budget neutral".

Conservatives were opposed to the cuts in medicare, as it was being used to simply fund another unfunded entitlement, thus further increasing the debt.

We are about reducing the debt, not increasing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:15 AM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,773,129 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
We have been through this with you before, but apparently you did not understand.

When Obama cut Medicare by $500 billion, he did so to finance Obamacare. Without this "cut" (which was never going to happen), as well as other fraudulent accounting measures, Obamacare would be "budget neutral".

Conservatives were opposed to the cuts in medicare, as it was being used to simply fund another unfunded entitlement, thus further increasing the debt.

We are about reducing the debt, not increasing it.
Repealing the health care law will increase the debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:16 AM
 
1,027 posts, read 824,992 times
Reputation: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Two things:

1. How come now conservatives trust the CBO, when any time CBO says good things about Democratic plans they say the CBO is wrong?

2. Ryan's plan balances the budget in 2040.

Slam Dunk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:19 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Two things:

1. How come now conservatives trust the CBO, when any time CBO says good things about Democratic plans they say the CBO is wrong?.
Nope, wrong...

When the CBO comes out and says that obama care is double counting this and that...which was proven by the CBO....and even told the admin, we cannot give an accurate reading because of this....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
2. Ryan's plan balances the budget in 2040.
O.K., you got me.....Now when does obamas plan balance the budget?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:20 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDirector View Post
Slam Dunk
Not really....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,858,215 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Absolutely. Why do you think Medicare Advantage was so successful?
MA plans provide a basic 80/20 level of insurance for people eligible for Medicare. The Ins Cos get about $14,000 per year from Medicare for every enrollee. The free market would charge about $12-13k for the same plans. The people with MA plans get Medicare plus free cotton balls, so they like the cotton balls. The Ins Cos get about 10% profit each year, they like that, Medicare does not have to process the claims but pay the additional 10% to the Ins Cos to handle the claims. Not a good return on an investment their as the cost to handle the claims would be about 2-3%, if that. The losers in the Medicare Advantage scam, are the American people who have to pay for the additional, unnecessary give away. You tell me, is Medicare Advantage a success?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
MA plans provide a basic 80/20 level of insurance for people eligible for Medicare. The Ins Cos get about $14,000 per year from Medicare for every enrollee. The free market would charge about $12-13k for the same plans. The people with MA plans get Medicare plus free cotton balls, so they like the cotton balls. The Ins Cos get about 10% profit each year, they like that, Medicare does not have to process the claims but pay the additional 10% to the Ins Cos to handle the claims. Not a good return on an investment their as the cost to handle the claims would be about 2-3%, if that. The losers in the Medicare Advantage scam, are the American people who have to pay for the additional, unnecessary give away. You tell me, is Medicare Advantage a success?
Yeah, MA has keep costs down much more efficiently than traditional Medicare. With more customers prices would come down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:38 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 8,551,670 times
Reputation: 14775
I've been trying to understand the connection between what the GOP says and does for decades. The only thing that keeps coming up in my mind is a scene from the Wizard of OZ. Remember when the big booming commands turned out to be from a sniveling, small mind in a dark, covered closet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:39 AM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,773,129 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Nope, wrong...

When the CBO comes out and says that obama care is double counting this and that...which was proven by the CBO....and even told the admin, we cannot give an accurate reading because of this....



O.K., you got me.....Now when does obamas plan balance the budget?
Budget Overview | The White House
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:45 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/121xx/doc...maryforWeb.pdf

The real numbers...

But this is from the CBO, so....I'm sure all lefties will complain...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top