Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
really? you might want to tell that to the federal judges in virginia and florida who disagree with you.
you keep posting that link, and how you managed to balance the budget, but you constantly forget that STATIC ECONOMIC MODELS DONT WORK with a dynamic economy.
LOL ....static models don't work...oh no...sure they don't.
Because the only way your B.S can work is if you put disparage all economic modeling....
That way your B.S can enter the equation.
Don't believe the economists....believe Hannity and Beck.
The fact that you keep posting the NYT link, is histerical.. Yep, I'm laughing at you again for thinking we're a static economy..
So you are telling me no one is proposing universal healthcare? You dont think the "subsidies" are entitlements? There isnt proposals to expand medicare to all? You dont think FEMA spending, in disaster areas are viewed as entitlemeents?
That figure is about as worthy as the other crap that comes outta ones butt.. Isnt it great to just make up stuff?
When the right wingers come on facts they can't dispute ....they just say "not true!"....lol
It's like arguing with 3rd graders.
Anybody can go to the CBO website and discover how many Americans will now be covered by insurance due to this law.
As with most govt plans, the true cost usually exceeds the expected costs as reality sets in. Do you think politicians will have the guts to really cut Medicare which is what most of the savings of Obamacare is based on? I'm not confident after seeing how Dems used Ryan's plan (not a great plan but a least should have started a discusion about the future insolvency of Medicare) as a political wedge to ignore the fiscal reality of the upcoming financial problems, instead of being honest with the American people.
Last edited by NSHL10; 06-02-2011 at 08:52 PM..
Reason: added
Why do you keep posting that the graph is a "lie" without the slightest bit of substantiation?
Unlike yourself, I've posted the CBPP's methodology and the CBO's revenue projections which you dismissed.
As they say, the ball is in your court.
I've already posted CBO reports which showed that tax cuts INCREASED revenues, but your graph shows they contributed to increasing debt. If you disagree with the CBO reports, please call the CBO and let them know. In the meantime, please stop embarassing yourself by using liberal made up graphs which dont hold one shred of fact..
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
LOL ....static models don't work...oh no...sure they don't.
Because the only way your B.S can work is if you put disparage all economic modeling....
That way your B.S can enter the equation.
Don't believe the economists....believe Hannity and Beck.
Ooh lookie, another poster who thinks they are smarter than the CBO.
But hey, lets review the CBO reports for accuracy, shall we?
Why are they so wrong? Because even the CBO does their projections on a static model.. But hey, your just as smart, I bet we can expect similar results from you for accuracy.. haha
You guys are too much..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
