Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2011, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Toledo
3,860 posts, read 8,453,455 times
Reputation: 3733

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnttokr1 View Post
Sexual misconduct meaning sexual harassment?
Depends on the office's policies. From what I have seen, a man who flirts with most of his co-workers is often seen as the office creep. A woman who does the same is often seen as a floozy. Neither one of those lables is better than the other. However, the line between flirting and sexual harrassment is thinner for men than it is for women. Men generally complain less than women when the opposite sex flirts with them in the workplace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2011, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Kenai, AK
169 posts, read 159,591 times
Reputation: 204
Swingers and Bi - because they show no commitment to another - they'll screw anything
Pedophilia - self explanatory and should be killed
bestiality - because molesting animals is just frigging WRONG!!
Scat - WRONG
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 01:24 PM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,161 posts, read 15,632,241 times
Reputation: 17152
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
I am not a judge nor jury, why do i care. None of these, these are already acceptable to some degree.

However what is not acceptable is those who prey and abuse sexually children. And Perverts not acceptable to me. Rapists not acceptable to me.

What two consentual adults do in the privacy of their home is their business not mine or should be any of you.
Most sensible post I've seen on this thread. I feel compelled to add though that pedophelia is not a lifestyle it is a criminal and heinous act. One best handled with a tall tree and a short rope. As to the OPs list....Im with CA jewel there. I feel better tending to my own affairs and am quite well occupied doing so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 01:27 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
72 posts, read 63,262 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by yayoi View Post
Depends on the office's policies. From what I have seen, a man who flirts with most of his co-workers is often seen as the office creep. A woman who does the same is often seen as a floozy. Neither one of those lables is better than the other. However, the line between flirting and sexual harrassment is thinner for men than it is for women. Men generally complain less than women when the opposite sex flirts with them in the workplace.
I would not lump sexual harassment and sexual promiscuity together. Lets say that neither a man or a woman is sleeping with their coworkers. Both are know to have a very active sex life with different partners. The man and his "sexual conquest" celebrated by his male counterparts but he will be labeled a "player" by his woman counterparts. The woman will be labeled a w**** and outcasted by her female counterparts and labeled as easy by her male counterparts.

Which one is more "socially acceptable" in your eyes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 01:38 PM
 
Location: lake zurich, il
3,197 posts, read 2,853,436 times
Reputation: 1217
Pedophillia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Toledo
3,860 posts, read 8,453,455 times
Reputation: 3733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnttokr1 View Post
I would not lump sexual harassment and sexual promiscuity together. Lets say that neither a man or a woman is sleeping with their coworkers. Both are know to have a very active sex life with different partners. The man and his "sexual conquest" celebrated by his male counterparts but he will be labeled a "player" by his woman counterparts. The woman will be labeled a w**** and outcasted by her female counterparts and labeled as easy by her male counterparts.

Which one is more "socially acceptable" in your eyes?
They're one in the same to me. Yes, I am aware that a double standard exists but I am not one to follow the herd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 02:47 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,464,091 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenaiSons View Post
Swingers and Bi - because they show no commitment to another - they'll screw anything
This isn't true at all. Bisexual people simply don't limit themselves in their dating potential. It doesn't mean that they screw everything that moves. Just like most straight people don't screw every single member of the opposite sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 02:50 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,464,091 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
I am not a judge nor jury, why do i care. None of these, these are already acceptable to some degree.

However what is not acceptable is those who prey and abuse sexually children. And Perverts not acceptable to me. Rapists not acceptable to me.

What two consentual adults do in the privacy of their home is their business not mine or should be any of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,007,099 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnttokr1 View Post
I would not lump sexual harassment and sexual promiscuity together. Lets say that neither a man or a woman is sleeping with their coworkers. Both are know to have a very active sex life with different partners. The man and his "sexual conquest" celebrated by his male counterparts but he will be labeled a "player" by his woman counterparts. The woman will be labeled a w**** and outcasted by her female counterparts and labeled as easy by her male counterparts.

Which one is more "socially acceptable" in your eyes?
Funny, but I havent noticed any women around here being forced to wear a scarlet A if she decides to bang more than one person.
Its really no ones business but hers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2011, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,065 posts, read 1,756,492 times
Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
none of these are offensive sexual behavors yet you seem to have omitted the worst of these which is pedophilia.
I guess that depends on whom you ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top