Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The whole time we had Byrd, you had Thurmond...so we're even. Well not really, cuz you had Helms too.
Yea, Duke was a Dem, but he sure as hell aint one now!
He stopped being a Democrat about when he announced he was wrong in being a racist. I guess one can summarize that its ok if you were a KKK member as long as you have a D next to your name but dont dare realize your wrong and become a R.
So says David Liep, who doesn't even note on any website (or even reference the official election website) but his own. He isn't noteworthy enough to get mentioned on any other website, save his linkedin which states his job is helping people connect "with the real world".
So says David Liep, who doesn't even note on any website (or even reference the official election website) but his own. He isn't noteworthy enough to get mentioned on any other website, save his linkedin which states his job is helping people connect "with the real world".
Maybe those apps would help a few people here.
So because you don't like the numbers you simply dismiss them? That's nice to know.
How does it feel to know that your entire premise for this thread just blew up in your face?
Our Campaigns - KS US Senate - D Primary Race - Aug 04, 1992 (http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=244692 - broken link)
"Democrat Gloria O'Dell, who is running far behind Republican Sen. Bob Dole in Kansas, was branded a lesbian by her primary opponent, the Rev. Fred Phelps, whose supporters held signs calling her a derogatory name for lesbians. Although Phelps was a fringe candidate who has mounted other hate campaigns, O'Dell, 46, a divorced mother, was dogged by questions from voters and forced to call a news conference to proclaim her heterosexuality and denounce his tactics. "
So 49 THOUSAND Democrats voted with Fred Phelps and supported his attack on this woman.
So because you don't like the numbers you simply dismiss them? That's nice to know.
How does it feel to know that your entire premise for this thread just blew up in your face?
Heh, riiight. A single website states Phelps numbers for one single year, and not the official polling numbers. Just some random guy with zero references on any legitimate organization and nothing that even mentions his name in relation to poll numbers outside his own published website...and you expect anyone to believe them?
I wish I could live in my own fantasy world like this. I bet it beats reality where people need real facts. If this is the quality of refutations, I am saddened by the level of debate. Here I thought I might actually get a challenge from some one.
Heh, riiight. A single website states Phelps numbers for one single year, and not the official polling numbers. Just some random guy with zero references on any legitimate organization and nothing that even mentions his name in relation to poll numbers outside his own published website...and you expect anyone to believe them?
I wish I could live in my own fantasy world like this. I bet it beats reality where people need real facts. If this is the quality of refutations, I am saddened by the level of debate. Here I thought I might actually get a challenge from some one.
You already do. It's the fantasy world that so many liberals live in that your typical white Republican male must be a white supremacist
Heh, riiight. A single website states Phelps numbers for one single year, and not the official polling numbers. Just some random guy with zero references on any legitimate organization and nothing that even mentions his name in relation to poll numbers outside his own published website...and you expect anyone to believe them?
I wish I could live in my own fantasy world like this. I bet it beats reality where people need real facts. If this is the quality of refutations, I am saddened by the level of debate. Here I thought I might actually get a challenge from some one.
Our Campaigns - KS Governor - D Primary Race - Aug 04, 1998 (http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=216670 - broken link)
Phelps also ran for gov. of KS in 1998, he got 15,233 Democrat votes in the primary.
He also ran for gov. in 1990
Our Campaigns - KS Governor - D Primary Race - Aug 07, 1990 (http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=373492 - broken link)
That time around he got 11,572 Democrat votes.
I could keep this up all night, would you like to continue or have you had enough of failing for the night?
Oh and by the way, the data source for everything I posted is listed on the same link you couldn't comprehend earlier.
Quote:
Data Sources:
Quote:
Source for Popular Vote data: Kansas Secretary of State. Division of Elections and Legislative Matters. 1992 Kansas General Election Results, Kansas Secretary of State. Division of Elections and Legislative Matters (Kansas Secretary of State - Elections & Legislative) (accessed 12 Dec 2000)
Source for Population data: U.S. Census Bureau.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He only won 2 counties but got votes in every single county. Seriously, if you want to be successful spreading your lies at least learn to read. 
