Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Actually they might get done now and for less money using private companies. If they don't do the work they get fired and a new firm gets hired. It's called "competition".
What services do you think should be "privatized"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:21 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,331,786 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Mayor Emanuel lays off city employees - Chicago Tribune




So if even Rahm Emmanuel "gets it" that when there is no money the size and scope of government must be reduced, why doesn't Obama get it?
The City of Chicago doesn't have its own treasury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 10:25 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,331,786 times
Reputation: 3235
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Actually they might get done now and for less money using private companies. If they don't do the work they get fired and a new firm gets hired. It's called "competition".
Private companies don't usually work for less money, boss; they work for a profit (compare Blackwater salaries to those of our taxpayer-funded U.S. troops). The idea that we should just outsource government agencies to privately-held corporations is one of the biggest examples of b.s. in the debate over what to do about the deficit.

For one thing the whole notion that a deficit is a horrible thing is itself a flawed premise. A deficit, and even some debt, is not bad; it's what governments do - they spend money on externalities that are not accounted for or deemed not worth spending money on by the private sector.

I don't mean to be an ass, but I really am irritated that we've got politicians manipulating this issue because they don't want tax cuts for the rich, while we have other politicians who are terrified of being voted out of office because they realize now that the average voter doesn't have any idea how their own economy works. The media doesn't seem interested in educated people, and even if they did, nobody watches anything like PBS because it's too 'boring.' This is a pathetically imbecilic society we're creating for ourselves, and we're going to be like a giant, diseased retarded mouse that can't even find its way out of a paper bag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top