Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I love how you first say it wasnt very scientific, and then you went on to include reasons why the results might actually be accurate. Such as, no ones heard of them.
Had Huffington not been included, liberals would have whined, waaa, waaa, you didnt include our rag piece in the polls.
Maybe the problem is that many have heard of them, they just rated it for what it is.. a POS..
That was bad wording on my part. It may have been scientific and should have said likely flawed., but if "trustworthiness" rating is influenced by familiarity....so what?
Last edited by padcrasher; 07-20-2011 at 09:57 AM..
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
