Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: If CCB had passed, would our Credit Rating have been cut?
Yes, it still would have. We're just in too deep. 55 36.18%
No. It would have shown we were serious about getting spending under control. 93 61.18%
I don't care, I want to keep spending like it's 1999. 4 2.63%
Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:13 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,047,317 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
As you display your hate for the Tea Party..

Never thought I'd meet anyone who had no problem showing their lack of understanding the real world as much as you.

What costs? Ever hear of bond market interest costs, capital carrying costs, rental costs, warehouse costs, depreciation costs, time depreciation of money costs, lost opportunity costs? You clearly live in some bubble and need to leave your moms basement, get a job and learn about basic information that all of society has to deal with.
Get a job?... Already have one.
They still have $500 BILLION more than they did 3 years ago... So who's failing math?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:16 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsy girl View Post
a completely predictable response from someone who lauds the tea party, the party of "i'm right and everyone else is wrong."

for your information tea partyers are anything but the common folk they would like to have others believe they are. according to several polls taken by cbs and ny times ( no, they're not fox, so i'm certain you'll dismiss them ) in 2010, tea party members are disproportionately composed of older white men ( over 45 ) with higher than average incomes who are more likely than the general public to catergorize their financial situation as good or very good. a large number - 44%- are christian fundamendalist. rather than being a a gathering of the common folk riding in on their white horses to save america, it sounds more likely that they are doing o.k. and want very much to keep it that way. they are not an inclusive group; in other words, gays are not welcome unless they subscibe to the theory that they are mentally ill and need to be cured, and my guess is few believers in pro-choice would feel very welcome in their midst. overall, a self righteous, pious group whose small mindedness and insular thinking is dangerous and destructive.
and no,i don't expect you to believe any of this information, or even investigate.
catsy girl
Sure sounds like you made a good strong case FOR the tea partiers, because it sounds like they are the tax payers of society, and not the leaches, for the most part.

As for the babble about gays not welcome. just stop outright lying. nothing worse than a poster who has to lie to create a position because you dont have the facts to back them up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:17 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Get a job?... Already have one.
They still have $500 BILLION more than they did 3 years ago... So who's failing math?...
They have $500B more than they did 3 years ago, because they earned it, something you said was impossible. It sounds like YOU are the one who failed math class. How the hell does your boss pay you? By stealing it? So you are now saying you help corporations steal money? Or is it more than likely that corporation has customers that CHOOSES to give the money in exchange for a product, and YOU help to facilitate that transaction in exchange for PAYMENT..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:20 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,047,317 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
They have $500B more than they did 3 years ago, because they earned it, something you said was impossible. It sounds like YOU are the one who failed math class.
They didn't "earn" it... It was done with layoffs...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Indiana
2,046 posts, read 1,574,505 times
Reputation: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Is there any doubt that the actions of the Tea Party Republicans have brought us to the brink of depression... Then blame liberals... You don't drastically cut back government spending in a recession, unless your goal is to cause a depression... Also keep in mind that virtually all of the debt was created by the Republicans with their unfunded wars and tax cuts for the wealthy...
FOR TWO YEARS DEMOCRATS HAD THE HOUSE, SENATE AND THE White House! FULL CONTROL OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WHAT DID THEY ACCOMPLISH. NOTHING!!!! EXECPT TO SPEND MORE MONEY AND WHAT GOOD DID THAT DO UNENPLOYMENT STILL ABOVE 9%. NO ONE IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OR TEA PARTY WERE TALKING ABOUT CUTTING GOVERNMENT SPENDING, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO ANY REAL CUTS. LET ALONE DRASTICALLY CUTTING SPENDING. IT IS A LIE FROM LIBERALS WHO ARE VERY INGNORANT AND HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT THEY ARE TALKNG ABOUT!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:35 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,047,317 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by gysmo View Post
FOR TWO YEARS DEMOCRATS HAD THE HOUSE, SENATE AND THE White House! FULL CONTROL OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WHAT DID THEY ACCOMPLISH. NOTHING!!!! EXECPT TO SPEND MORE MONEY AND WHAT GOOD DID THAT DO UNENPLOYMENT STILL ABOVE 9%. NO ONE IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OR TEA PARTY WERE TALKING ABOUT CUTTING GOVERNMENT SPENDING, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO ANY REAL CUTS. LET ALONE DRASTICALLY CUTTING SPENDING. IT IS A LIE FROM LIBERALS WHO ARE VERY INGNORANT AND HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT THEY ARE TALKNG ABOUT!!!!!
Fillibuster... Fillibuster... Fillibuster...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:42 PM
 
Location: delaware
698 posts, read 1,051,816 times
Reputation: 2438
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Sure sounds like you made a good strong case FOR the tea partiers, because it sounds like they are the tax payers of society, and not the leaches, for the most part.

As for the babble about gays not welcome. just stop outright lying. nothing worse than a poster who has to lie to create a position because you dont have the facts to back them up.


careful your fear is definitely showing. a typical tea party response- we're good, hardworking people, and the poor are just a bunch of lazy sots who don't deserve a crumb from our table. we've lived right and they've lived wrong- otherwise they wouldn't be poor. and that is a primary tenet of the tea party group- the so-called poor ( those who are lazy and not like us ) are going to take what we have, and we can't let that happen. in tea party lingo that amounts to socialism-scary stuff.

the newest tea party darling, michelle bachman, has stated many times the party line on gays- she doesn't judge them ( oh no, thinking someone is mentally ill and needs to be cured is not judging ) but gays are definitely deviants and can never have marriage or a family which can only be reserved for heterosexuals. again, there is the tea party fear that their good, christian ( their term, not mine ) lifestyle may be contaminated in some way if gays are allowed the same privileges. it seems that the tea party is a fearful group- their way of life is being threatened by people who are not like them. it's an us against them conflict.

before you can accuse me of being gay or poor,i'll save you the trouble. i'll let you know that i'm heterosexual and am grateful that i've never been poor or even remotely down on my luck. and one more thing, i've voted both democratic and republican in the past. but one thing i'll never be is a subscriber to the small minded sanctimonious group that calls themselves the tea party
catsy girl
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:45 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Fillibuster... Fillibuster... Fillibuster...
Name a few of those filibustered bills that would have made one bit of difference. I'll wait patiently..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:48 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsy girl View Post
careful your fear is definitely showing. a typical tea party response- we're good, hardworking people, and the poor are just a bunch of lazy sots who don't deserve a crumb from our table. we've lived right and they've lived wrong- otherwise they wouldn't be poor. and that is a primary tenet of the tea party group- the so-called poor ( those who are lazy and not like us ) are going to take what we have, and we can't let that happen. in tea party lingo that amounts to socialism-scary stuff.
Actually that was what YOU said. YOU are the one who broke out their members by income levels. And I'm not a tea partier, so stop your hate babble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsy girl View Post
the newest tea party darling, michelle bachman, has stated many times the party line on gays- she doesn't judge them ( oh no, thinking someone is mentally ill and needs to be cured is not judging ) but gays are definitely deviants and can never have marriage or a family which can only be reserved for heterosexuals. again, there is the tea party fear that their good, christian ( their term, not mine ) lifestyle may be contaminated in some way if gays are allowed the same privileges. it seems that the tea party is a fearful group- their way of life is being threatened by people who are not like them. it's an us against them conflict.
Michele Bachman doesnt speak for the tea partiers. Now by your own admission your babble is based upon outright lies
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsy girl View Post
before you can accuse me of being gay or poor,i'll save you the trouble. i'll let you know that i'm heterosexual and am grateful that i've never been poor or even remotely down on my luck. and one more thing, i've voted both democratic and republican in the past. but one thing i'll never be is a subscriber to the small minded sanctimonious group that calls themselves the tea party
catsy girl
Could care less of your sexual orientation. Didnt ask, didnt care. Is this similar to those who claim they have "black friends" to justify their racism?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 12:53 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,047,317 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Name a few of those filibustered bills that would have made one bit of difference. I'll wait patiently..
What?????... Too many to list...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top