Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have another "Sad" story. My first cousin who is like a brother ... a very upstanding man of impeccable character ... hard working, caring father and loyal husband was victimized by a woman who was apparently unfamiliar with any of those character qualities that defined him, including honesty and integrity and decency.
They were married for about 7 years, had three children (all boys), when one day out of the blue, he was served with divorce papers. Totally dumbfounded given the absence of any overt marital issues ... with him believing that all was well, she callously informed him that her and her "girlfriend" (a person who he believed was just a close, long time friend) had maintained their lesbian relationship throughout the entirety of their marriage, and it was her sole purpose for marrying him in order to produce children for her and her lesbian lover to later raise together.
As a result of the way child custody laws generally work, she being the mother was automatically granted custody in absence of evidence of being unfit, with him being responsible for paying her child support in excess of $1400 per month. Apparently, the total lack of integrity demonstrated by this fraud purposely committed against this man did not qualify as evidence for her being an unfit mother, so she and her "girlfriend" were the big winners in their dastardly scheme, while he and the children, the losers. And yes, the children were losers too, as one could not design a better father from scratch, given unlimited options to choose from.
And this little scenario is not an isolated case. Of course, homosexuals do not have a corner on the market when it comes to dishonesty and lack of integrity to be sure ... but they sure seem capable of rationalizing some pretty outrageous behavior in facilitating their desires and achieving their goals without the slightest bit of conscience getting in the way.
In my view, she was an adulteress fraud, totally void of any quality that would constitute fitness to be a mother, and should have been ordered to pay him child support, with him granted full custody. Unfortunately, that's not the way things work today.
The lesbians want to steal my sperm! The lesbians want to steal my sperm!
Ahh... so NOW we see where some of your prejudice comes from.
You think it's totally irrelevant that many gay and lesbian couples are raising children and that many straight couples are not?
Basically you are saying that you think a family consisting of a lesbian couple with 2 children should not be allowed the same protections, benefits and rights as a heterosexual couple with 2 children or a heterosexual couple with no children.
I'm still waiting to see where you have hidden your logic and critical analysis skills.
You divert ....
I really don't believe in homosexual couples raising children at all, if we're being totally honest.
It's just another of the many signs of a defunct America, in full free fall collapse.
The lesbians want to steal my sperm! The lesbians want to steal my sperm!
Ahh... so NOW we see where some of your prejudice comes from.
No ... that such a morally bankrupt response would be offered to this story of despicable deceit and betrayal is sadly consistent among your ilk. And it is exactly that attitude that illustrates why the judgment of the majority who find your group so twisted and distasteful, and lacking of morality have merit. The overall lack of respect for everything decent, while simultaneously embracing every deviation defines your group mentality, and why so many find it disgusting.
It's not a Pre-Judgment ... it's a Post-Judgment, and it's quite accurate.
Last edited by GuyNTexas; 09-04-2011 at 04:23 PM..
No ... that such a morally bankrupt response would be offered to this story of despicable deceit and betrayal is sadly consistent among your ilk. And it is exactly that attitude that illustrates why the judgment of the majority who find your group so twisted and distasteful, and lacking of morality have merit. The overall lack of respect for everything decent, while simultaneously embracing every deviation defines your group mentality, and why so many find it disgusting.
It's not a Pre-Judgment ... it's a Post-Judgment, and it's quite accurate.
Accurate based on what? I have yet to meet a gay person (and I know a lot of them) that meets any of the definitions you gave. I'm sure there are some morally bankrupt gay people out there...just like there are morally bankrupt people. Again--has nothing to do with being gay. And just cause you knew of one lesbian couple that did that doesn't mean that all gay people are like that.
The fact you talk about "your ilk" and "your group" etc. just illustrates your prejudice even more.
I really don't believe in homosexual couples raising children at all, if we're being totally honest.
It's just another of the many signs of a defunct America, in full free fall collapse.
Homosexuality is hardly restricted to America. It exists even in countries that legally and socially condemn it, like Iran. Obviously condemning it isn't enough to stop it. How do you explain that one?
The very idea of making pedophillia acceptable is disgusting! That cannot be good for children. These people are sick freaks and need to be locked in a mental hospital. Along with all other pedophiles
I also agree with public executions of convicted child molesters.
So sick. The very idea of public excutions of anyone is sick and would take sick people to want to view it...and I would hope that actual physical evidence would be involved in the conviction and not just the testimony of the accuser and those in the employ of the government who are paid to "protect children"
So sick. The very idea of public excutions of anyone is sick and would take sick people to want to view it
Agreed--and such specks of human debris actually manage to convince themselves that they are superior to pedophiles because they only advocate homicide, lol. The hypocrisy speaks for itself and needs no commentary.
Speaking of sex and hypocrisy, have you ever seen the movie Quills? It's worth a watch sometime.
It appears next up on the loons agenda is normalizing pedophelia's
A child molester is someone who hurts children. They (children) cannot defend themselves and need someone to protect them. The best way to protect them is to remove threats. If someone hurts a child, they are a threat. Death is a great deterent.
Accurate based on what? I have yet to meet a gay person (and I know a lot of them) that meets any of the definitions you gave. I'm sure there are some morally bankrupt gay people out there...just like there are morally bankrupt people. Again--has nothing to do with being gay. And just cause you knew of one lesbian couple that did that doesn't mean that all gay people are like that.
The fact you talk about "your ilk" and "your group" etc. just illustrates your prejudice even more.
Meet:
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques
Agreed--and such specks of human debris actually manage to convince themselves that they are superior to pedophiles because they only advocate homicide, lol. The hypocrisy speaks for itself and needs no commentary.
Speaking of sex and hypocrisy, have you ever seen the movie Quills? It's worth a watch sometime.
Here we have someone who thinks highly of pedophiles .... scoffing at those who find them to be vile creatures.
And I hold NO PRE-JUDICE .... It is POST-JUDGMENT based on actions and statements that are vile and show the lack of character and morality of the group you defend.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.