Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He went to Harvard. he's published in law review...its posted on elections thread. ad infinitum... a 2.4 is pathetic for any professional, let alone someone who wants to run for public office.
And we all know how terrified liberals are of honest, law abiding citizens legally carrying firearms. Just the thought makes them wet themselves, whether it's true or not that that they all carry firearms.
I am a known second amendment advocate on this board based on three years of previous threads. I own various firearms that require BATFE approval and the 200$ tax stamp. Some that haven't been allowed transfer unless ownership was prior to 1986. Get it? I'm active in the local, political community endorsing and promoting the second amendment. I carry concealed all the time. I'm not a liberal, I'm anti right wing, extremist, tea party mentality. I, and many like me, do not believe that firearms and politics mix well. You bring a gun to a political rally, you change the whole temper of the debate. Save your second amendment arguements for another thread. You're barking at the moon on this one.
I am a known second amendment advocate on this board based on three years of previous threads. I own various firearms that require BATFE approval and the 200$ tax stamp. Some that haven't been allowed transfer unless prior to 1986. Get it? I'm active in the local, political community endorsing the second amendment. I carry concealed all the time. I'm not a liberal, I'm anti right wing, extremist, tea party mentality. I, and many like me do not believe that firearms and politics mix well. You bring a gun to a political rally, you change the whole temper of the debate. Save your second amendment arguements for another thread. You're barking at the moon on this one.
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,458,803 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country
Get a clue, Obama is not a dictator. Stop complaining about the fact that he has to work through and around the tea party caucus. defeat the tea party politicians and he can do allot more. I don't get you saying he failed on HC. He wants single payer. He got what he could get with these nut case tea party people he is up against. Take back the House and senate. Take the power of any resistance away from reteacans and then if he doesn't do what you wish by all means belly ache and vote him out. Until then take your message to the streets. Start by showing up when the tea party does ready to do battle(because they will be) its better than asking Obama to just wave a wand.
So what are you saying, that you have no complaints whatever re: Obama? Or have the "reateacans" simply made you "dumb down" your expectations so much, that you can't tolerate any criticism of him (even from liberals)? And BTW, how is your absolutist "my way or the highway" zealotry any different from the tea party types?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx
I am a known second amendment advocate on this board based on three years of previous threads. I own various firearms that require BATFE approval and the 200$ tax stamp. Some that haven't been allowed transfer unless ownership was prior to 1986. Get it? I'm active in the local, political community endorsing and promoting the second amendment. I carry concealed all the time. I'm not a liberal, I'm anti right wing, extremist, tea party mentality. I, and many like me, do not believe that firearms and politics mix well. You bring a gun to a political rally, you change the whole temper of the debate. Save your second amendment arguements for another thread. You're barking at the moon on this one.
Problem with this strategy is that the tea party believe in going to political rallies wearing guns.
This tends to change the dynamics of political rallies.
You got that right.
An armed society is a polite society. Something the liberal union-loving goons needed to be reminded of from time to time. As everyone knows, only liberals get violent at political rallies.
You bring a gun to a political rally, you change the whole temper of the debate.
Absolutely true! Just the presence of firearms at a political rally is enough to make liberals with violent intent reconsider their position. And you think that is a "bad thing?"
He went to Harvard. he's published in law review...its posted on elections thread. ad infinitum... a 2.4 is pathetic for any professional, let alone someone who wants to run for public office.
He went to Harvard. he's published in law review...its posted on elections thread. ad infinitum... a 2.4 is pathetic for any professional, let alone someone who wants to run for public office.
I'm kinda partial to those that never stepped foot on a college campus.
They seem to have much more common sense, than the brain washed idiots holding office today.
An armed society is a polite society. Something the liberal union-loving goons needed to be reminded of from time to time. As everyone knows, only liberals get violent at political rallies.
Depends. That armed guy who waited for his girlfriend outside her fitness club and gunned her down was very polite I'm sure. I'd feel safe at an NRA rally but not necessarily at a political rally. Too many loose nuts out there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.