Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2011, 11:35 AM
 
2,514 posts, read 1,987,937 times
Reputation: 362

Advertisements

Duplicate thread
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2011, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,713,235 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn2390 View Post
If you have EVER heard of anything good from the present administration, you were lied to..
You will never find anything good to say about this corrupt, incompetant bunch of crooks. They will be dismissed next year, hopefull some will be in jail..

DADT has been repealed. No lie. It's a very good thing.

Thanks OP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,789,619 times
Reputation: 1937
Growth is good news, an increase in hiring would be better news.

Let me give you all a mistake made by the Obama Administration: the financial sector not being dealt with when the iron was hot. Significant financial industry and regulation reform is not possible now. That is the big fumble made by this administration, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,645 posts, read 26,393,631 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Yup. It's funny how no conservatives have started threads about the better news about the economy. I wonder why that is?


It's just that we have a different standard for "better news about the economy"...

"The recession ended in 1982 and by 1983, the U.S. economy was growing at extremely healthy rates. Between Q1 of 1983 and Q2 of 1984, average GDP growth was more than 7 percent. This is not to say the U.S. economy will replicate this pace of growth in the quarters ahead, but we have previously seen the rubber-band effect after deep recessions and there is no reason why it couldn’t happen again."

U.S. GDP - 1980s Redux? | Kathy Lien


"One of the strongest features of the Reagan expansion was the job creation numbers. Almost 20 million jobs were created in just seven years."

The Reagan Information Page:Job Creation



1983 - NBC News Overnight part 1 - YouTube



Show me a quarter with a 9.3% increase in GDP and we'll have something to talk about.

Create 20 million private sector jobs and I'll be impressed.


A 2.5% increase in GDP is a joke.

That you think it deserves applause is hilarious!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,789,619 times
Reputation: 1937
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
A 2.5% increase in GDP is a joke.

That you think it deserves applause is hilarious!
The Reagan Administration's accomplishment was done with both the Executive and Legislative branches working together.

With the bad blood between the two branches today, 2.5% may be the best that can be done.

That's no joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:18 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,776,811 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
It's just that we have a different standard for "better news about the economy"...

"The recession ended in 1982 and by 1983, the U.S. economy was growing at extremely healthy rates. Between Q1 of 1983 and Q2 of 1984, average GDP growth was more than 7 percent. This is not to say the U.S. economy will replicate this pace of growth in the quarters ahead, but we have previously seen the rubber-band effect after deep recessions and there is no reason why it couldn’t happen again."

U.S. GDP - 1980s Redux? | Kathy Lien


"One of the strongest features of the Reagan expansion was the job creation numbers. Almost 20 million jobs were created in just seven years."

The Reagan Information Page:Job Creation



1983 - NBC News Overnight part 1 - YouTube



Show me a quarter with a 9.3% increase in GDP and we'll have something to talk about.

Create 20 million private sector jobs and I'll be impressed.


A 2.5% increase in GDP is a joke.

That you think it deserves applause is hilarious!
Thank you for making my point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,645 posts, read 26,393,631 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by geofra View Post
The Reagan Administration's accomplishment was done with both the Executive and Legislative branches working together.

With the bad blood between the two branches today, 2.5% may be the best that can be done.

That's no joke.

TEFRA—the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act—which [COLOR=#216221 !important][COLOR=#216221 !important]congressional[/color][/color] Democrats promised would involve a ratio of $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases (which they said would consist only of closing loopholes). TEFRA passed later that year, and the tax increases certainly happened but, as Reagan later put it in his autobiography, “the Democrats reneged on their pledge and we never got those cuts.”

Reagan


Working together?

Not really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,645 posts, read 26,393,631 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Thank you for making my point.
Yes, 2.5% is hardly worth mentioning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:38 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,463,833 times
Reputation: 3563
These statistics are only fluctuations of the baseline. Even if statistics will show 1% lower growth it is still insignificant (although people moods may change following that kind of news). A significant change in the overall trend will be noticed by all. "When you see it, you will know"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,789,619 times
Reputation: 1937
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post

Working together?

Not really.
Not really; but really, they did.

Look up ERTA-1981.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top