Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How about championing civil rights for Christans in the countries where we supported the Arab spring uprisings? Don't they deserve the right to worship without having their churches burnt down?
How about championing civil rights for Christans in the countries where we supported the Arab spring uprisings? Don't they deserve the right to worship without having their churches burnt down?
I APPROVE THIS MESSAGE!!! Bravo! - WE NEED CHANGE....
as someone said in '08...but did not follow thru. or did he?
Personally,you are wrong .This issue has no business being in the political arena to begin with.This issue of [women's rights] is a personal belief you will either be right or wrong.It depends on how you views [women's rights].How each country addressed it there own business .Are you telling me there isn't something our tax dollars couldn't be used on ? America has got enough problems on it's own.We can't be the worlds policeman to every moral wrong .
change gays to Women/Blacks and you will see why its an issue. Because not so long ago, women couldn't vote, and didn't have a say in their reproductive rights. Blacks were treated a second class citizens.
I thought liberals are for diversity? Why can't they accept that among 7 billion people in the world most don't view homosexuality as an appropriate lifestyle that should be tolerated?
You make absolutely no sense. I highly doubt that the majority of Americans support the use of borrowed money to support gay agendas overseas. You're delusional if you think otherwise.
I thought liberals are for diversity? Why can't they accept that among 7 billion people in the world most don't view homosexuality as an appropriate lifestyle that should be tolerated?
Fail. We are, that's why we're for accepting them, especially because it is not a choice.
And your post has a lot of holes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay
You make absolutely no sense. I highly doubt that the majority of Americans support the use of borrowed money to support gay agendas overseas. You're delusional if you think otherwise.
How about championing civil rights for Christans in the countries where we supported the Arab spring uprisings? Don't they deserve the right to worship without having their churches burnt down?
Wouldn't that constitute using tax money to promote the spread of Christianity?
I thought liberals are for diversity? Why can't they accept that among 7 billion people in the world most don't view homosexuality as an appropriate lifestyle that should be tolerated?
Most of those 7 billion people are in poverty, starvation, and have no education.
Their only exposure to gays is the lies spread by ignorant, hateful, "Christian" missionaries.
And no, liberals do not accept diversity without a rational reason to do so. Supporting hatred and discrimination of hundreds of millions of people who have done nothing wrong cannot be tolerated by anyone with a brain and compassion. Two things conservatives typically lack.
That's all you got? What's wrong, you can't support your proclamation that you're right? Laughable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.