Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well lets see, Republicans try to legislate lots of things based one what THEY want ... like gay marriage,
Wrong again.. Marriage is a religious function, and its gays wanting to force themself into a religious act. Furthermore, this has been repeatedly put on ballots and voted down, by Democrats as well as Republicans, and will ultimately be resolved by the courts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
what a woman can or can't do with their bodies,
Wrong. The GOP wants the baby to have a say about what can happen to THEIR bodies
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
marijuana etc.
I didnt realize marijuana was a GOP issue. Thats odd considering Democrats have held Congress 3x as much as the GOP over the last 40 years..
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
So where am I wrong? Todays republican is a walking contradiction
It would be easier to list where you are correct.. Here it goes..
x
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
As to the part of "not helping the economy" I am referring to job creation... you know, what Reublicans SAY they are about.
I didnt realize it was governments job to create legislation which focused on job creations. Where is this witten?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
you know, what Reublicans SAY they are about.
So now the Democrats arent about creating jobs? What was the purpose of the stimulus then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
This here is about making one person richer and taking away from a actual entity ( a casino which EMPLOYS people) in other words creating a rich get richer and poor getting poorer scenerio.
Are you going to keep on arguing?
I'm going to continue to point out your ignorance, especially if you believe websites make "one person" richer.. haha.. tell me you are still living in your moms basement. How many jobs does Google have for example? Microsoft? Amazon, Ebay? Haha, according to you.. they are all 1 person entities.. haha
How? Because I dont believe government has the right to tell me how to spend my money? Tell me why you think they do
No, because you're going with the obligatory whine about something you'd rather have, complaining because Obama administration actually favors something you would but won't accept it out of sheer hatred. The blinders getting in the way. Or, did I get that wrong and you're, in fact, a proponent of something along these lines?
Bush moves to shut down web gambling
No wonder I see people whining, complaining and betting that Obama is no different than Bush.
Wrong again.. Marriage is a religious function, and its gays wanting to force themself into a religious act. Furthermore, this has been repeatedly put on ballots and voted down, by Democrats as well as Republicans, and will ultimately be resolved by the courts.
Wrong, again, the fact that gays can get married in several states and growing shows that the courts are reversing the bigotry and hate the GOP preaches. Keep your religion to yourself
Wrong. The GOP wants the baby to have a say about what can happen to THEIR bodies
Thats why there is a law against late term abortions and early term are legal...
I didnt realize marijuana was a GOP issue. Thats odd considering Democrats have held Congress 3x as much as the GOP over the last 40 years.. The GOP has traditionally been against marijuana... you know, the "war on drugs"
It would be easier to list where you are correct.. Here it goes..
x
I didnt realize it was governments job to create legislation which focused on job creations. Where is this witten?
So now the Democrats arent about creating jobs? What was the purpose of the stimulus then?
I'm going to continue to point out your ignorance, especially if you believe websites make "one person" richer.. haha.. tell me you are still living in your moms basement. How many jobs does Google have for example? Microsoft? Amazon, Ebay? Haha, according to you.. they are all 1 person entities.. haha
Love the little word games with no substance in the last part... if anything, the Dems seem to be more about creating jobs these days. Heck, the GOP is still trying to figure out what the word fidelity means. Last time I checked, Google, Amazon, Microsof created jobs unlike this entity that you are showing your ignorance about.
No, because you're going with the obligatory whine about something you'd rather have, complaining because Obama administration actually favors something you would but won't accept it out of sheer hatred. The blinders getting in the way. Or, did I get that wrong and you're, in fact, a proponent of something along these lines?
Bush moves to shut down web gambling
No wonder I see people whining, complaining and betting that Obama is no different than Bush.
um.. I didnt whine, nor did I complain But hey, never stop with the non stop babbling hate..
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M_Indie_08
Love the little word games with no substance in the last part... if anything, the Dems seem to be more about creating jobs these days. Heck, the GOP is still trying to figure out what the word fidelity means. Last time I checked, Google, Amazon, Microsof created jobs unlike this entity that you are showing your ignorance about.
Boy, you seem to like failing alot
So all of those computer/internet companies create jobs, but somehow those internet casinos seem to run without them Wow, thats like magic, ha?
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration cleared the way for U.S. states to legalize Internet poker and certain other online betting in a switch that may help them reap billions in tax revenue and spur web-based gambling
Bravo! After three years he has finally made a good decision! I'll give him thumbs up for this one.
It should be a state to state issue. EVERYTHING should not have a federal ban, or a federal "thumbs up".
Well, agreed. But I, like others, will count him in when the term "Obama Administration" is used. Let's be honest, if the "Obama Administration" had done something bad (which, they have) everyone will single him out. Can't single him out when it's convenient for us.
And this is coming from someone who will 100% not be voting for him next year.
Why should people get to vote on whether or not others can do in the privacy of their own home?
If your against the legalization of drugs, how about just...not doing them? If you're against gay marriage, how about you just refrain from marrying a member of the same sex? Instead of voting against it, people should just mind their on business.
Legalize gambling, prostitution, and marijuana. It stops infringing on our individual liberty and can bring in plenty of money...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
