Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2012, 09:32 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,960,029 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

I wonder how the rest of the world, especially Russia, Iran and China look at the US and its everlasting wars.

First we invaded Iraq, then Afghanistan, then Libya, and of course there are still further threats to other countries as well, such as Iran and North Korea.

Hitler invaded country after country, and eventually enough countries got fed up and joined to take them out. I'm sure Hitler sold his people that they were doing the right thing by taking over these countries as well.

Looking at all this from a human perspective rather than an Amero Centric perspective, I would not be surprised Russia and China join in with Iran and take out the US. Were at our lowest point economically, and it would not be a hard sell to the people of other countries to make the US look evil, by pointing out the ever encroaching police state we find ourselves in, not to mention we have one of the highest incarceration rates in the world. The US used similar propaganda for other countries in the past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2012, 09:56 PM
 
373 posts, read 710,393 times
Reputation: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
I wonder how the rest of the world, especially Russia, Iran and China look at the US and its everlasting wars.

First we invaded Iraq, then Afghanistan, then Libya, and of course there are still further threats to other countries as well, such as Iran and North Korea.

Hitler invaded country after country, and eventually enough countries got fed up and joined to take them out. I'm sure Hitler sold his people that they were doing the right thing by taking over these countries as well.

Looking at all this from a human perspective rather than an Amero Centric perspective, I would not be surprised Russia and China join in with Iran and take out the US. Were at our lowest point economically, and it would not be a hard sell to the people of other countries to make the US look evil, by pointing out the ever encroaching police state we find ourselves in, not to mention we have one of the highest incarceration rates in the world. The US used similar propaganda for other countries in the past.
The part you said about the USA being "taken out" seems impossible because we have more than enough weapons to take them out also. Some say Iran must be stopped before they nuke Isreal ..........That would only mean TOTAL destruction of Iran..Iran would radiate from the destruction for 1000 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 02:06 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by orogenicman View Post
I was referring to their attempts to shut down the strait during the Iran-Iraq war. That didn't go over well then, and it won't go over well now. We have placed sanctions on them, and rightly so. Do you really want to see a nuclear Iran? Really? All they have to do is fully comply with the terms of the NNPT, which they agreed to do when they signed it.

I don't want to see another war. Hell, enough is enough from where I sit. I had two nephews and a cousin in harm's way these past ten years. At the same time, we have treaty obligations with our allies, and it certainly IS in our interest to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. If we cannot stop the proliferation, how does the rest of the world expect us and the other nuclear armed nations to disarm?
Do you really think Iran wants to nuke the U.S.? seriously? When has anybody from Iran threatened such a thing? Even if they could, they aren't stupid, that is mutually assured destruction, or certainly their own suicidal mission. They are completely surrounded by U.S. bases.

Yes, they signed the non-proliferation treaty, and guess who isn't living up to it, the U.S. We have no intention of disarming. We (Obama) said we cannot meet our deadline of 2012, and will need another decade. Our word means nothing. Iran signed it, and we have yet to prove they are developing anything other than energy. We've been here before, with Iraq, going to war under false pretenses. If you are so gung ho for war, do it right, and have it declared by Congress. Have a plan to get in and get out - or don't do it. Right now, war with Iran would include war with Russia, and China. Do you really want WWIII? The IAEA stated that they may be, which means they have no evidence. BACK OFF
Now, Saudi Arabia has said they will increase their oil production, in the event Iran isn't willing or able to move their oil. So this panic about Hormuz, is not our problem. We get most of our oil from Mexico and Canada. This is Europe's problem, let them deal with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 07:57 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,198,208 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman57 View Post
All this "war on terror" has done by design is weaken us down to be easily whipped.
How has it weakened us? What are we low on ammo now? One could take the opposite position that the US Military has more combat experience (and built upon that experience) than any other military in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 08:44 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,442,882 times
Reputation: 4070
Talking Bad news for chickenhawks and armchair generals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angorlee View Post
Iran threatened to close the Straits of Hormuz if we put pressure on other countries not to buy their oil. Oil is there main source of revenue and if they lose that source it will put Iran into a depression since their economy is doing poorly right now. What we want is for Iran to go into a depression and the Iranian people rise up and overthrow the regime. But the Iranian leadership sees this danger and they are instead going to force the situation by closing the Straits of Hormuz. Of course we will open the Straits of Hormuz because with it being closed the prise of our oil go sky high right at the time when we are having economic problems that are quite serious. But it will take a military clash to open the straights. Iran knows that it is dangerous to get in a war with the mighty U.S. but like Japan before WW2 they are forced into a corner. They think that if a war happens and they can drag it out the american people will get sick of wars and rise up against. We probably won't rise up against it but who knows with all the trouble thats been happening lately. Its getting close right now and it is very scary. A war with Iran could lead to anything including WW3.

There will be no war with Iran.

Your war action desires will have to be satisfied by the video game that Santa brought you last week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
They tend to leave that part out of American history books.
Exactly....back to the old adage "The winner writes the history books".

You can see all the same run up talking points coming for Iran as we did for other unjust wars of late.

Might as well sell our SUVs and 4x4s now and grab scooters and hybrids because next summer it'll be $5 per gal. gas again(if we are lucky for it to stay THAT low).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Greensboro, NC USA
6,157 posts, read 7,224,746 times
Reputation: 2468
Quote:
Originally Posted by yachtcare View Post
Nukes are old school by now.....

Look at weapons technology advances from the period of the civil war, to WWI, a span of 50 years. Compare further, the advances from the end of WWI to the beginning of WWII, then the advances during the 5-7 yrs of that war itself, culminating in nuclear weapons.

To think some other, far more advanced weapon system hasnt been developed in the past SEVENTY years, might be somewhat shortsighted.

HAARP, is the one that comes to mind, right off hand. A quick search will show that Russia, and China, also seem to have developed their versions of HAARP as well. Just what these things do is very speculative. But the larger powers seem to want them, which tells me they are weapons, and not research facilities.

Just sayin'.......

YC.......
There is a lot our government has kept under wraps in regards to technology and even where that technology has come from. We might be surprised if we knew what secrets the government is keeping......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 10:45 AM
 
126 posts, read 78,078 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Well, they left this out of the American history books too:This is China after the Japanese invasion btw.
There are so many stupid, ignorant and moronic people in this thread that its not even worth trying to correct them.

I am f--king part japanese and to claim that they were not totally at fault for atrocities done prior and during WW2 is a sign of mental illness. The US was more than justified for blockading Japan, and trying to stop its imperialistic actions, but there are so many morons posing as america-haters because its the latest cool fad their society-failure HS political science teacher taught them, they don't know any better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 10:47 AM
 
126 posts, read 78,078 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawg82 View Post
Saudi Arabia has bought tons of our weapon systems - let them fight this. We shouldn't be their pit bulls or their bouncers. Let them use their own military to keep the strait open and let them fight their own fights. If they can't take Iran, then they suck and they can take it from there. We have enough oil in North America that we shouldn't be paying for that country in American blood (or Iranian). All these countries in the ME (Israel, Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc) can take car of themselves and don't need us and we need to quit pretending that they do cuz they are playing us for fools and all our money.
Ugh, I cannot wait for the day the idiot Ron Paul loses and leaves the primary so all of his psychotic followers will hopefully vanish along with him, until they can latch onto some other lunatic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2012, 10:50 AM
 
126 posts, read 78,078 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman57 View Post
Iran aint Iraq and unlike Iraq they will fight and have a serious military NOT ONLY in Iran but around the globe.
Uh, no they don't. They're military is garbage, they have nothing besides assymmetric terror proxies, but conventionally would not last 5 minutes against the US.

Quote:
And don't think Russia and China will just sit on the sideline either.
LOL, you think either will go to war for Iran? You have no clue.

Quote:
Plus with most of our military tied up, tired out and just plain wore out we can't fight a real war.
Do you make this stuff up as you go along? There is not one item in your entire post that is factual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top