Come On Folks, Global Warming is Real (Ron Paul, Congress, election)

[joebaldknobber]

I am concerned as a Global Warming voter that no presidential candidate is addressing what they will do to save the planet.

Who should Global Warming voters vote for in 2012?

[FrugalYankee]

Yes we're having a really nice winter this year.

I think I'll go and burn some more garbage this evening.

[whogo]

Originally Posted by joebaldknobber

I am corcerned as a Global Warming voter that no presidential candidate is addressing what they will do to save the planet.

Who should Global Warming voters vote for in 2012?

They should stay home on election day.

[saltine]

heat miser? http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbfgVEk-mxQ

Originally Posted by joebaldknobber

I am corcerned as a Global Warming voter that no presidential candidate is addressing what they will do to save the planet.

Who should Global Warming voters vote for in 2012?

[monkeywrenching]

Originally Posted by joebaldknobber

I am corcerned as a Global Warming voter that no presidential candidate is addressing what they will do to save the planet.

Who should Global Warming voters vote for in 2012?

vote for Ron Paul. global warming is not real, and nothing man can do, does more damage than the sun all by itself.

[rbohm]

Originally Posted by joebaldknobber

I am corcerned as a Global Warming voter that no presidential candidate is addressing what they will do to save the planet.

Who should Global Warming voters vote for in 2012?

it is true, climate change is in fact real. it has been for more than 4 billion years. there is nothing man can do to stop it though.

[Ford Beebe]

Originally Posted by monkeywrenching

vote for Ron Paul. global is not real, and nothing man can do, does more damage than the sun all by itself.

So says right wing radio and a few paid "scientists" who are shills for the fossil fuel industry,

Peer-reviewed studies by real climate scientists disagree with you.

It's pure intellectual dishonesty on your part, politicalizing science like this. Why don't we listen to the experts who publish peer-reviewed studies?

[Skinny Puppy]

It's 48 degress in North Dakota, you bet it's real.

[rbohm]

Originally Posted by Ford Beebe

So says right wing radio and a few paid "scientists" who are shills for the fossil fuel industry,

Peer-reviewed studies by real climate scientists disagree with you.

It's pure intellectual dishonesty on your part, politicalizing science like this. Why don't we listen to the experts who publish peer-reviewed studies?

you can make the SAME case for those scientist that are claiming that climate change is man made. follow the money.

[monkeywrenching]

Originally Posted by Ford Beebe

So says right wing radio and a few paid "scientists" who are shills for the fossil fuel industry,

Peer-reviewed studies by real climate scientists disagree with you.

It's pure intellectual dishonesty on your part, politicalizing science like this. Why don't we listen to the experts who publish peer-reviewed studies?

so sorry, i dont subscribe to the left nor the right. neither side of the global warming crowds should be getting 1 penny of federal money to prevent something that isnt there.

also, i am not policalizing science, the liberal left is. after all, if global warming is supposed to be true, then take away all the taxpayer money and see how long that remains true.


http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/legislati...al-Warming.htm