Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Saddam was against Al-queda. His country had none of the al-queda followers. He he found any he would have them killed. Why would he be involved with an organization that he hates to attack a country that hates him and has troops poised to invade his country?
He might be ruthless but he's not a COMPLETE moron.
He might be ruthless but he's not a COMPLETE moron.
Might want to put that in the past tense.
Anyway, the answer is, no.
Saddam Hussein, the Mossad, the CIA, Bush, etc. What I think is so hilarious about 9/11 is the blame going around. Everyone is responsible except the guys who actually did it, have admitted it and boast about it constantly.
Saddam was against Al-queda. His country had none of the al-queda followers. He he found any he would have them killed. Why would he be involved with an organization that he hates to attack a country that hates him and has troops poised to invade his country?
He might be ruthless but he's not a COMPLETE moron.
like SOME national leaders that find themselves in positions of power simply due to their family names...
I listened to General Petraeus' testimony the other day and, if you believe his comments were credible, he answered "No" when asked the question. Usama hated Saddam for his secular view of the Muslim religion. Does anyone really think Saddam, being the egotistical maniac he was, would relinquish any power to bin Ladin?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.